About: Drennen v. London Assurance Co.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Drennen v. London Assurance Co. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/k95zhdjY8

Drennen v. London Assurance Co., 113 U.S. 51 (1885), was a fire insurance case regarding two policies of fire insurance, issued March 10, 1883, by the London Assurance Corporation, of London for the property of the firm of Drennen, Starr & Everett, a business in the city of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The loss occurred on July 29, 1883.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Drennen v. London Assurance Co. (en)
rdfs:comment	Drennen v. London Assurance Co., 113 U.S. 51 (1885), was a fire insurance case regarding two policies of fire insurance, issued March 10, 1883, by the London Assurance Corporation, of London for the property of the firm of Drennen, Starr & Everett, a business in the city of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The loss occurred on July 29, 1883. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Drennen v. London Assurance Co. (en)
dct:subject	United States Supreme Court cases Building fires in the United States Property insurance 1885 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Waite Court
Wikipage page ID	13705595 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	895897024 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 113 United States Supreme Court cases Minnesota Building fires in the United States Property insurance 1885 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Waite Court L. Ed. Minneapolis, Minnesota
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/113/51/ http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep113/usrep113051/usrep113051.pdf
sameAs	Drennen v. London Assurance Co. Drennen v. London Assurance Co. Drennen v. London Assurance Co. Drennen v. London Assurance Co.
SubmitDate	0001-12-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
SubmitYear	1884 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc
JoinMajority	unanimous (en)
ParallelCitations	5 (xsd:integer)
USPage	51 (xsd:integer)
USVol	113 (xsd:integer)
case	Drennen v. London Assurance Co., (en)
DecideDate	0001-01-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1885 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Drennen v. London Assurance Co. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/113/51/
Litigants	Drennen v. London Assurance Co. (en)
majority	Harlan (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep113/usrep113051/usrep113051.pdf
has abstract	Drennen v. London Assurance Co., 113 U.S. 51 (1885), was a fire insurance case regarding two policies of fire insurance, issued March 10, 1883, by the London Assurance Corporation, of London for the property of the firm of Drennen, Starr & Everett, a business in the city of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The loss occurred on July 29, 1883. At the ensuing trial, the amount was not disputed, but since each policy contained a provision that it should be void if the property insured "be sold or transferred, or any change takes place in title or possession, (except by succession by reason of the death of the insured,) whether by legal process, or judicial decree, or voluntary transfer or conveyance," all interest or liability on the part of the issuer would immediately terminate.' The defendant disputed its liability on the ground that Drennen, Starr & Everett, on May 24, 1883, before the loss, admitted one Arndt as a partner in their firm, and that thereby, without its knowledge or consent, and by the voluntary act of the plaintiffs, the title, interest, and possession of the insured in the property was changed, and the policies became void. The plaintiffs denied that Arndt became a member of their firm, and substantial proof was given that Arndt resided in Sandusky, Ohio. He visited Minneapolis in May 1883, and first became acquainted with plaintiffs Drennen and Starr on or about May 20. Negotiations then commenced with Drennen and Starr, who acted for their firm. In the court's judgment of the agreement as a whole, the parties did not contemplate or establish a partnership. The agreement was for a corporation with all the payments and other specified items for preparation for its formation and no change in the title or possession of the property. This was sufficient to dispose of the case, reversing the decision and setting a new trial. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Drennen_v._London_Assurance_Co.?oldid=895897024&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	2983 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Drennen_v._London_Assurance_Co.
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 113 List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Waite Court 113 U.S. 51 Drennen v London Assurance Co.
is Wikipage redirect of	113 U.S. 51 Drennen v London Assurance Co.
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Drennen_v._London_Assurance_Co.

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3332 as of Dec 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 72 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software