About: Lists of landmark court decisions

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Lists of landmark court decisions Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/56T4QZEsZB

Landmark court decisions, in present-day common law legal systems, establish precedents that determine a significant new legal principle or concept, or otherwise substantially affect the interpretation of existing law. "Leading case" is commonly used in the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth jurisdictions instead of "landmark case", as used in the United States. A leading decision may settle the law in more than one way. It may do so by:

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Grundsatzentscheidung (de) Keputusan kebijakan (in) Arrêt de principe (fr) Lists of landmark court decisions (en) 랜드마크 판례 목록 (ko)
rdfs:comment	Als Grundsatzentscheidung werden Urteile und Beschlüsse oberer oder oberster Gerichte bezeichnet, die Rechtsfragen von grundsätzlichem Interesse erstmals klären oder eine bedeutende grundsätzliche Änderung in der Interpretation geltenden Rechtes vornehmen. (de) Keputusan kebijakan atau putusan kebijakan (bahasa Inggris: Landmark decision) adalah hasil kasus hukum yang menetapkan suatu yang mengubah penafsiran hukum atau menetapkan untuk masalah tertentu. Beberapa kasus dalam kategori ini dikenal luas dan dipelajari oleh profesi hukum. (in) Un arrêt de principe est un arrêt dans lequel est posé un principe d'application générale qui permettra de régir des cas futurs analogues. Le contraire d'un arrêt de principe est un « arrêt d'espèce ». Dans les États de common law comme le Canada et les États-Unis, un arrêt de principe peut aussi être une décision créatrice de droit nouveau, en vertu du pouvoir créateur de droit des juges de common law. Par exemple, les arrêts de principe Brown v. Board of Education et Roe v. Wade ont considérablement modifié le droit américain en matière de ségrégation raciale et d'accès à l'avortement. (fr) 랜드마크 판례 목록은 전 세계의 랜드마크 판례들을 모은 것이다. (ko) Landmark court decisions, in present-day common law legal systems, establish precedents that determine a significant new legal principle or concept, or otherwise substantially affect the interpretation of existing law. "Leading case" is commonly used in the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth jurisdictions instead of "landmark case", as used in the United States. A leading decision may settle the law in more than one way. It may do so by: (en)
dcterms:subject	Judgment (law)
Wikipage page ID	404714 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1124937974 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Canada A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department Precedent Robert Menzies Patriation Reference Privity in English law Ben Chifley Bill of Rights 1689 2017-18 Australian parliamentary eligibility crisis Delgamuukw v British Columbia Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia Judicial Committee of the Privy Council List of International Court of Justice cases Peter H. Russell United Kingdom Defence of the Realm Act 1914 Indefinite detention Statutory interpretation Section Eight of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Voting age Quebec (AG) v Blaikie (No 1) Promissory estoppel Prorogation in the United Kingdom Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia Strict liability Lord Atkin Commonwealth v Tasmania Communist Party of Australia Constitution of India Constitutional convention (political custom) Contract Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service Court of Appeal of New Zealand Court of Session Mens rea Negligence R. v. Oakes Tulk v Moxhay Re Judiciary and Navigation Acts Royal prerogative in the United Kingdom R v Chaytor R v Feeney R v Marshall R v Morgentaler R v R R v Sharpe Entick v Carrington Monopoly Concurrence Consent (criminal law) Constitution bench (India) Corporate opportunity Criminal Code (Canada) The Moorcock Equity (law) Obiter Reference re Provincial Electoral Boundaries (Sask.) London Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General Board of directors Stare decisis State supreme court Common assault Common law Furniss v Dawson Hadley v Baxendale Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala Mahe v Alberta Malaysian Solution R v Sparrow A. H. F. Lefroy Bushel's Case Actus reus Darcy v Allein William Blackstone Williams v Commonwealth Williams v Commonwealth (No 2) Distinguishing Court of Appeal of England and Wales Irwin Toy Ltd v Quebec (AG) Jury Law v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) Mischief rule Section Fifteen of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section Seven of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 45th Parliament of Australia Abortion

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3332 as of Dec 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 62 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software