About: Lochner v. New York

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Lochner v. New York Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/AdFGPjUNHR

Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that a New York state law setting maximum working hours for bakers violated the bakers' right to freedom of contract under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The decision has been effectively overturned.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	لوشنر ضد نيويورك (ar) Lochner v. New York (de) Lochner v. New York (fr) Lochner contro New York (it) Lochner v. New York (en) 로크너 대 뉴욕 주 사건 (ko)
rdfs:comment	로크너 대 뉴욕주 사건(Lochner v. New York 198 U.S. 45 (1905)) 뉴욕주 입법부는 제과점 점원의 근무시간을 1일 10시간, 1주 60시간으로 제한하는 내용의 주법을 제정하였다. 미국 연방대법원은 근무시간의 제한이라는 수단이 공공복리(公共福祉)의 증진이라는 목적과 합리적으로 연관되어 있지 아니하고, 오히려 제과점 점원과 주인 간의 계약의 자유를 침해한다고 하여 동 주법을 위헌이라고 판결하였다. (ko) لوشنر ضد نيويورك، 198 الولايات المتحدة 45 (1905)، كان قرارا تاريخيا من المحكمة العليا في الولايات المتحدة التي ترى أن حدود وقت العمل تنتهك التعديل الرابع عشر. وقد تم إلغاء القرار فعليا. ويقتصر قانون ولاية نيويورك ساعات عمل موظفي المخابز على 10 ساعات في اليوم و 60 ساعة في الأسبوع. ورجحت أغلبية من خمسة قضاة أن القانون ينتهك شرط الإجراءات القانونية الواجبة، مشيرة إلى أن القانون يشكل «تدخلا تعسفيا وغير معقول وغير ضروري في حق الفرد وحريته في التعاقد». وقد رفض أربعة قضاة معارضين هذا الرأي، وأصبحت معارضة أوليفر ويندل هولمز الابن، على وجه الخصوص، واحدة من أشهر الآراء في التاريخ القانوني للولايات المتحدة. (ar) Lochner v. New York, 198 U, S. 45 (1905), ist eine Entscheidung des Obersten Gerichtshofs der Vereinigten Staaten. Sie gilt im Recht der Vereinigten Staaten als Meilenstein für die Rechtsprechung zum . Der US Supreme Court entschied, dass Arbeitszeitbeschränkungen gegen den 14. Verfassungszusatz verstoßen. Die Entscheidung gilt heute als faktisch aufgehoben. (de) Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that a New York state law setting maximum working hours for bakers violated the bakers' right to freedom of contract under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The decision has been effectively overturned. (en) Par l'arrêt Lochner v. New York de 1905 (198 US 45), la Cour suprême des États-Unis déclare inconstitutionnelle une législation de l'État de New York limitant les horaires hebdomadaires de travail. Par 5 voix contre 4, la Cour interprétait en particulier le XIVe Amendement et la clause de due process comme impliquant une liberté contractuelle totale, empêchant toute régulation législative de celle-ci. La loi annulée, le Bakeshop Act de 1895, avait limité la journée de travail des boulangers à 10 heures, et la semaine à 60 heures. (fr) Il caso Lochner contro New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905) fu una causa giudiziaria negli Stati Uniti, su cui nel 1905 la Corte Suprema emise un verdetto che segnò una svolta. La controversia riguardava l'orario di lavoro; la Corte suprema sentenziò che una legge che ponesse un limite massimo alle ore lavorate era in violazione del Quattordicesimo emendamento della Costituzione. Nel tempo, successive decisioni della Corte suprema ribaltarono questa sentenza. (it)
foaf:name	(en) Joseph Lochner, Plaintiff in Error v. People of the State of New York (en)
foaf:depiction
dct:subject	1905 in New York (state) United States Supreme Court cases United States labor case law Working time United States Supreme Court cases of the Fuller Court 20th-century American trials Legal history of New York (state) United States substantive due process case law Baking 1905 in United States case law
Wikipage page ID	361179 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1115546632 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Roe v. Wade Rufus W. Peckham North Eastern Reporter Privileges or Immunities Clause David Bernstein (law professor) Anticanon Holden v. Hardy John Paul Stevens List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 198 Paternalism Richard Epstein Robert Bork Usury Utah Utica, New York Due Process Clause List of landmark court decisions in the United States 1905 in New York (state) United States Supreme Court cases United States labor case law Working time Commerce clause Coppage v. Kansas Oneida County, New York Christianity Edward Douglass White Edwin Meese George Sutherland Morality Mugler v. Kansas Munn v. Illinois Bernard Siegan Legal opinion Louisiana Slaughter-House Cases Columbia Law Review Police power (United States constitutional law) Survival of the fittest C-SPAN United States Supreme Court cases of the Fuller Court Cato Institute Center for American Progress U.S. state Washington (state) West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish William Howard Taft William R. Day Willis Van Devanter Dissenting opinion Laissez-faire Landmark Cases: Historic Supreme Court Decisions Lochner era Adkins v. Children's Hospital Allgeyer v. Louisiana Due process clause Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Brief (law)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3332 as of Dec 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 68 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software