About: Patterson v. New York

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Patterson v. New York Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/9Xicci9FQs

Patterson v. New York, 432 U.S. 197 (1977), was a legal case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States that stated that the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause did not prevent the burdening a defendant with proving the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance as defined by New York law.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Patterson v. New York (en)
rdfs:comment	Patterson v. New York, 432 U.S. 197 (1977), was a legal case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States that stated that the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause did not prevent the burdening a defendant with proving the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance as defined by New York law. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Patterson v. New York (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Supreme Court cases 1977 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court United States criminal burden of proof case law
Wikipage page ID	15170337 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1002169794 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 432 Due Process Clause LexisNexis United States Supreme Court cases Mens rea Mullaney v. Wilbur Lawyers' Edition Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Legal case Provocation (legal) 1977 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court Supreme Court of the United States United States criminal burden of proof case law New York Court of Appeals Excuse New York Penal Law
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.nebraskapen.org/Malice/Patterson.html https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/432/197.html https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/432/197/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1976/75-1861 http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep432/usrep432197/usrep432197.pdf
sameAs	Patterson v. New York Patterson v. New York Patterson v. New York Patterson v. New York
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Ussc dbt:Criminal_due_process
Dissent	Powell (en)
JoinDissent	Brennan, Marshall (en)
JoinMajority	Burger, Stewart, Blackmun, Stevens (en)
LawsApplied	Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1976/75-1861
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
USPage	197 (xsd:integer)
USVol	432 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-03-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1977 (xsd:integer)
case	Patterson v. New York, (en)
DecideDate	0001-06-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1977 (xsd:integer)
findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/432/197.html
fullname	Patterson v. New York (en)
Holding	Shifting the burden of proof of a mitigating circumstance affirmative defense to the defendant does not violate the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/432/197/
Litigants	Patterson v. New York (en)
majority	White (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep432/usrep432197/usrep432197.pdf
has abstract	Patterson v. New York, 432 U.S. 197 (1977), was a legal case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States that stated that the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause did not prevent the burdening a defendant with proving the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance as defined by New York law. The court found that the State of New York had reclassified provocation ("extreme emotional disturbance") as an excuse (an affirmative defense requiring proof by preponderance of the evidence), rather than a circumstance negating the mental element (mens rea), which the prosecution had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, as was the situation in Mullaney v. Wilbur (1975). (en)
NotParticipating	Rehnquist (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Patterson_v._New_York?oldid=1002169794&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	5613 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Patterson_v._New_York
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of United States Supreme Court cases involving constitutional criminal procedure Jones v. United States (1999) Mullaney v. Wilbur Apprendi v. New Jersey Justification and excuse 432 U.S. 197 Hendershott v. People Patterson v New York
is Wikipage redirect of	432 U.S. 197 Patterson v New York
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Patterson_v._New_York

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3332 as of Dec 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 71 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software