• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Tibetan sovereignty debate     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatReligiousControversies, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Act100030358yago:Action100037396yago:Change100191142yago:Conflict100958896yago:Controversy107183151yago:Disagreement107180787yago:Dispute107181935yago:Event100029378yago:GroupAction101080366yago:Motion100331950yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:WikicatHistoricalControversiesyago:WikicatIndependenceMovementsyago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntityyago:SpeechAct107160883yago:Wikicat20th-centuryConflictsyago:Wikicat21st-centuryConflictsyago:WikicatPoliticalControversiesyago:WikicatReligiousControversies New Facet based on Instances of this Class

The Tibetan sovereignty debate refers to two political debates. The first political debate is about whether or not the various territories which are within the People's Republic of China (PRC) that are claimed as political Tibet should separate themselves from China and become a new sovereign state. Many of the points in this political debate rest on the points which are within the second historical debate, about whether Tibet was independent or subordinate to China during certain periods of its recent history.