Archibald v. Braverman, 275 Cal. App. 2d 253 (1969), was a case decided by the California Court of Appeals that first ruled that visual perception of an accident was not a necessary prerequisite to recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress under the criteria enunciated in Dillon v. Legg. The holding in Archibald was later overruled by the 1989 case Thing v. La Chusa.
Attributes | Values |
---|---|
rdfs:label |
|
rdfs:comment |
|
name |
|
foaf:depiction | |
dcterms:subject | |
Wikipage page ID |
|
Wikipage revision ID |
|
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage | |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page | |
sameAs | |
subsequent actions |
|
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
thumbnail | |
case |
|
court | |
courtlistener | |
full name |
|
judges |
|
justia | |
has abstract |
|
concurring |
|
date decided |
|
decision by |
|
googlescholar | |
number of judges |
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom | |
page length (characters) of wiki page |
|
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of | |
is Wikipage redirect of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic of |