About: Arnold v Teno

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Arnold v Teno Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FArnold_v_Teno&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Arnold v Teno, [1978] 2 SCR 287 is a leading tort case from the Supreme Court of Canada. This decision was part of a trilogy of personal injury cases including Andrews v Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd (1978) and Thornton v Prince George School Board (1978).

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Arnold v Teno (en)
rdfs:comment	Arnold v Teno, [1978] 2 SCR 287 is a leading tort case from the Supreme Court of Canada. This decision was part of a trilogy of personal injury cases including Andrews v Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd (1978) and Thornton v Prince George School Board (1978). (en)
dcterms:subject	Ice cream vans 1978 in Canadian case law Canadian tort case law Supreme Court of Canada cases
Wikipage page ID	5227005 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	999442785 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Samuel Sereth Lieberman Brain damage Ice cream vans Personal injury 1978 in Canadian case law Tort List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Laskin Court) Court of Appeal for Ontario Canadian tort case law Supreme Court of Canada cases Supreme Court of Canada Ice cream truck Kuipers v Gordon Riley Transport
sameAs	Arnold v Teno Arnold v Teno Arnold v Teno
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Canada-law-stub dbt:Reflist dbt:SCCInfoBox dbt:Lexum-scc2
JoinMajority	Laskin CJ and Judson and Dickson JJ (en)
citations	[1978] 2 SCR 287 (en)
history	Mixed judgment by the Court of Appeal for Ontario. (en)
majority	Spence J (en)
ratio	Various rulings made regarding damages for personal injury. (en)
has abstract	Arnold v Teno, [1978] 2 SCR 287 is a leading tort case from the Supreme Court of Canada. This decision was part of a trilogy of personal injury cases including Andrews v Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd (1978) and Thornton v Prince George School Board (1978). (en)
case-name	Arnold v Teno (en)
Concurrence	Pigeon J (en)
Concurrence/Dissent	de Grandpré J (en)
decided-date	1978-01-19 (xsd:date)
full-case-name	Yvonne Teno and Orville Teno (en) J.B. Jackson Limited and Stuart Galloway v. Diane Marie Teno, an Infant by her Next Friend Orville Teno, the Said Orville Teno and Yvonne Teno and Teno in her Capacity as Defendant to a Claim for Indemnity (en) Wallace Arnold and Brian Arnold v. Diane Marie Teno, an Infant by her Next Friend Orville Teno, the Said Orville Teno and Yvonne Teno (en)
heard-date	0001-06-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
JoinConcurrence	Martland, Ritchie, and Beetz JJ (en)
ruling	Appeal allowed in part. (en)
SCC	1973 (xsd:integer)
gold:hypernym	Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Arnold_v_Teno?oldid=999442785&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	3881 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Arnold_v_Teno
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Arnold v. Teno List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Laskin Court) Kuipers v Gordon Riley Transport Ron Cummings
is Wikipage redirect of	Arnold v. Teno
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Arnold_v_Teno

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software