About: Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:Trial105799212, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FAssociated_Provincial_Picture_Houses_Ltd_v_Wednesbury_Corp&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 is an English law case that sets out the standard of unreasonableness of public-body decisions that would make them liable to be quashed on judicial review, known as Wednesbury unreasonableness. The court gave three conditions on which it would intervene to correct a bad administrative decision, including on grounds of its unreasonableness in the special sense later articulated in Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service by Lord Diplock:

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:WikicatCommonLawRules yago:WikicatLegalTests yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Cognition100023271 yago:Concept105835747 yago:Content105809192 yago:Event100029378 yago:Experiment105798043 yago:Happening107283608 yago:HigherCognitiveProcess105770664 yago:Idea105833840 yago:Inquiry105797597 yago:ProblemSolving105796750 yago:Process105701363 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:Rule105846054 yago:Thinking105770926 yago:Trial105799212
rdfs:label	Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp (en)
rdfs:comment	Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 is an English law case that sets out the standard of unreasonableness of public-body decisions that would make them liable to be quashed on judicial review, known as Wednesbury unreasonableness. The court gave three conditions on which it would intervene to correct a bad administrative decision, including on grounds of its unreasonableness in the special sense later articulated in Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service by Lord Diplock: (en)
name	Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	1947 in England United Kingdom administrative case law Common law rules Legal tests Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases United Kingdom constitutional case law 1947 in British law 1947 in case law
Wikipage page ID	572774 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1097916326 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	English law Wednesbury Patently unreasonable 1947 in England Borough United Kingdom administrative case law Judicial review United States Due process Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service Equity (law) Staffordshire Fundamental justice Administrative law Common law rules Court of Appeal of England and Wales Legal tests European Court of Human Rights Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases United Kingdom constitutional case law Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. Kenneth Diplock, Baron Diplock Donald Somervell, Baron Somervell of Harrow 1947 in British law 1947 in case law Cinematograph Act 1909 Human Rights Act 1998 Movie theater John Edward Singleton Wednesbury unreasonableness in Singapore law Arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable Lord Greene Re Smith & Fawcett Lord Greene MR dbr:Wikt:resile
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://web.archive.org/web/20130501053939/http:/www.justis.com/titles/iclr_s4821028.html
sameAs	Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Italic_title dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Start_date dbt:Use_British_English dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:Ussc dbt:Cite_BAILII dbt:Administrative_law dbt:Infobox_court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Wednesbury,_former_cinema.jpg?width=300
caption	Former Wednesbury Cinema (en)
citations	[1948] 1 KB 223, (en)
court	Court of Appeal of England and Wales
judges	Donald Somervell, Baron Somervell of Harrow John Edward Singleton Lord Greene
keywords	Judicial review (en)
has abstract	Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 is an English law case that sets out the standard of unreasonableness of public-body decisions that would make them liable to be quashed on judicial review, known as Wednesbury unreasonableness. The court gave three conditions on which it would intervene to correct a bad administrative decision, including on grounds of its unreasonableness in the special sense later articulated in Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service by Lord Diplock: So outrageous in its defiance of logic or accepted moral standards that no sensible person who had applied his mind to the question to be decided could have arrived at it. (en)
date decided	1947-11-10 (xsd:date)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Associated_Provincial_Picture_Houses_Ltd_v_Wednesbury_Corp?oldid=1097916326&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	8906 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Associated_Provincial_Picture_Houses_Ltd_v_Wednesbury_Corp
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	R. v. North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 57 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software