About: BBC v Johns

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: BBC v Johns Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:SpeechAct107160883, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FBBC_v_Johns&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

BBC v Johns [1965] Ch 32 is a case in UK administrative law.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:WikicatBBCControversies yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Act100030358 yago:Controversy107183151 yago:Disagreement107180787 yago:Dispute107181935 yago:Event100029378 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case yago:SpeechAct107160883
rdfs:label	BBC v Johns (en)
rdfs:comment	BBC v Johns [1965] Ch 32 is a case in UK administrative law. (en)
name	BBC v Johns (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	United Kingdom administrative case law BBC controversies 1965 in England 1965 in case law 1965 in British law
Wikipage page ID	27035394 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	921286084 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	BBC v Harper Collins United Kingdom administrative case law Income tax BBC controversies R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Northumbria Police Authority Harold Danckwerts 1965 in England BBC 1965 in case law Gordon Willmer Court of Appeal (England and Wales) Kenneth Diplock, Baron Diplock 1965 in British law Lord Diplock Royal prerogative R (ProLife Alliance) v. BBC UK administrative law
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://swarb.co.uk/the-british-broadcasting-corporation-v-johns-hm-inspector-of-taxes-ca-5-mar-1964/
sameAs	BBC v Johns BBC v Johns BBC v Johns BBC v Johns
subsequent actions	Taken by Bilawal Bukhari (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:England-law-stub dbt:Expand_section dbt:Start_date dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_BAILII dbt:Infobox_court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg?width=300
court	Court of Appeal (England and Wales)
full name	The British Broadcasting Corporation v F.D. Johns (en)
italic title	yes (en)
judges	Harold Danckwerts Gordon Willmer Kenneth Diplock, Baron Diplock
has abstract	BBC v Johns [1965] Ch 32 is a case in UK administrative law. (en)
appealed from	Muhammad Shamyl Khan (en)
appealed to	Muawiz Butt (en)
Concur/dissent	Diplock LJ (en)
concurring	Danckwerts LJ (en)
date decided	1964-03-05 (xsd:date)
decision by	Willmer LJ (en)
number of judges	3 (xsd:integer)
opinions	Government can not automatically create new prerogative powers, and that the BBC does not enjoy Crown immunity from taxation (en)
gold:hypernym	Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:BBC_v_Johns?oldid=921286084&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	2528 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:BBC_v_Johns
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	R (ProLife Alliance) v BBC Kenneth Diplock, Baron Diplock BBC v HarperCollins Publishers Ltd
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:BBC_v_Johns

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 56 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software