BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell, 581 U.S. ___, 137 S. Ct. 1549 (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Montana courts lacked personal jurisdiction over a railroad that was not incorporated in Montana and did not have its principal place of business in Montana, even though the railroad had more than 2,000 miles of track and 2,000 employees within Montana. It was the first Supreme Court case argued before a Court that included newly appointed Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell, 581 U.S. ___, 137 S. Ct. 1549 (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Montana courts lacked personal jurisdiction over a railroad that was not incorporated in Montana and did not have its principal place of business in Montana, even though the railroad had more than 2,000 miles of track and 2,000 employees within Montana. It was the first Supreme Court case argued before a Court that included newly appointed Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- BNSF Railway Co., Petitioner v. Kelli Tyrrell, special administrator for the Estate of Brent T. Tyrrell, Deceased, et al. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
docket
| |
JoinMajority
| - Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
OpinionAnnouncement
| |
OralArgument
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell, (en)
|
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - BNSF Railway Co., Petitioner v. Kelli Tyrrell, special administrator for the Estate of Brent T. Tyrrell, Deceased, et al. (en)
|
Holding
| - A state court does not have personal jurisdiction over a railroad that is neither incorporated in nor headquartered in the state, on a claim that does not arise from an occurrence within the state, even though the railroad has extensive trackage and many employees in the state (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell (en)
|
majority
| |
other source
| |
other url
| |
has abstract
| - BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell, 581 U.S. ___, 137 S. Ct. 1549 (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Montana courts lacked personal jurisdiction over a railroad that was not incorporated in Montana and did not have its principal place of business in Montana, even though the railroad had more than 2,000 miles of track and 2,000 employees within Montana. It was the first Supreme Court case argued before a Court that included newly appointed Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch. (en)
|
Concurrence/Dissent
| |
OralReargument
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |