About: Babcock v. Jackson

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Babcock v. Jackson Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FBabcock_v._Jackson&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Babcock v. Jackson, 191 N.E.2d 279, 12 N.Y.2d 473 (N.Y. 1963) is a landmark U.S. case on conflict of laws. A husband and wife from New York went on a car trip with a friend Babcock to Ontario. While in Ontario they had a motor vehicle accident. Babcock sued Jackson, the driver, claiming his negligence caused the car crash.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	Babcock v. Jackson (en)
rdfs:comment	Babcock v. Jackson, 191 N.E.2d 279, 12 N.Y.2d 473 (N.Y. 1963) is a landmark U.S. case on conflict of laws. A husband and wife from New York went on a car trip with a friend Babcock to Ontario. While in Ontario they had a motor vehicle accident. Babcock sued Jackson, the driver, claiming his negligence caused the car crash. (en)
dcterms:subject	Conflict of laws case law 1963 in New York (state) New York (state) state case law 1963 in United States case law
Wikipage page ID	10653179 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1039197887 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Conflict of laws case law New York Supreme Court North Eastern Reporter Conflict of laws 1963 in New York (state) New York (state) state case law John F. Scileppi Charles S. Desmond John Van Voorhis (judge) Stanley H. Fuld Marvin R. Dye 1963 in United States case law Adrian P. Burke New York Court of Appeals New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Ontario Motor vehicle accident Sydney F. Foster
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/archives/babcock_jackson.htm https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=6790323544590499634
sameAs	Babcock v. Jackson Babcock v. Jackson Babcock v. Jackson
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Infobox_New_York_COA_case dbt:US-case-law-stub
Dissent	Van Voorhis (en)
JoinDissent	Scileppi (en)
JoinMajority	Desmond, Dye, Burke, Foster (en)
Prior	Complaint dismissed, Sup. Ct. Special Term; aff'd, App. Div. (en)
ArgueDate	0001-01-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1963 (xsd:integer)
case	17280.0 (second)
citations	17280.0 (second)
court	New York Court of Appeals
DecideDate	0001-05-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1963 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Georgia W. Babcock v. Mabel B. Jackson, as Executrix of William H. Jackson, Deceased (en)
Holding	The law of the jurisdiction governs that has the strongest interest in the resolution of the particular issue presented. Appellate Division reversed. (en)
Litigants	Babcock v. Jackson (en)
majority	Fuld (en)
other source	Google Scholar (en) New York Courts (en)
other url	https://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/archives/babcock_jackson.htm https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=6790323544590499634
has abstract	Babcock v. Jackson, 191 N.E.2d 279, 12 N.Y.2d 473 (N.Y. 1963) is a landmark U.S. case on conflict of laws. A husband and wife from New York went on a car trip with a friend Babcock to Ontario. While in Ontario they had a motor vehicle accident. Babcock sued Jackson, the driver, claiming his negligence caused the car crash. This case brought up a question of ‘choice of law’; if the law of the place of residence of the accident victims (New York) be applied, or, should the law of the place of the tort (Ontario) be applied. Under the old conflict rules, the law of the place of the accident should apply. However, Ontario had a law that prohibited passengers from suing the driver. The court rejected a traditional fixed method of determining which law should apply, and instead, a process of weighing factors such as relationship between the party, decision to take the trip, connections to the locality. Thus, the Court held that the parties did not have substantial connection with Ontario and so it would be unfair to apply the law as the location was largely fortuitous. The Court found that the jurisdiction with the most connections was New York and so New York law should apply. (en)
AssociateJudges	John F. Scileppi John Van Voorhis (judge) Stanley H. Fuld Marvin R. Dye Adrian P. Burke Sydney F. Foster
ChiefJudge	Charles S. Desmond
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Babcock_v._Jackson?oldid=1039197887&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	3288 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Babcock_v._Jackson
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Characterisation (law) Conflict of tort laws Massachusetts v. Purdue Stanley H. Fuld New York Court of Appeals
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Babcock_v._Jackson

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software