About: Baxter v. Montana     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FBaxter_v._Montana&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Baxter v. Montana, is a Montana Supreme Court case, argued on September 2, 2009, and decided on December 31, 2009, that addressed the question of whether the state's constitution guaranteed terminally ill patients a right to lethal prescription medication from their physicians. The Montana Supreme Court sidestepped the question of if medical aid in dying is guaranteed under Montana State Constitution, but it instead ruled, on narrower grounds, that neither legal precedent nor the state's statute deem such assistance to be against public policy or illegal. Montana is one of ten states in which aid in dying is authorized. The others are California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington; it is authorized in the District of Columbia as well.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Baxter v. Montana (de)
  • Baxter v. Montana (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Baxter v. Montana ist ein am Obersten Gerichtshof des US-Bundesstaates Montana am 2. September 2009 verhandelter Fall zur Frage ob die Verfassung des Staates Montana unheilbar kranken Personen ein Recht auf den Erwerb tödlicher Medikamente zum Zweck der vorzeitigen Beendigung des eigenen Lebens verleiht. (de)
  • Baxter v. Montana, is a Montana Supreme Court case, argued on September 2, 2009, and decided on December 31, 2009, that addressed the question of whether the state's constitution guaranteed terminally ill patients a right to lethal prescription medication from their physicians. The Montana Supreme Court sidestepped the question of if medical aid in dying is guaranteed under Montana State Constitution, but it instead ruled, on narrower grounds, that neither legal precedent nor the state's statute deem such assistance to be against public policy or illegal. Montana is one of ten states in which aid in dying is authorized. The others are California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington; it is authorized in the District of Columbia as well. (en)
foaf:depiction
  • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_Montana.gif
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
thumbnail
Dissent
  • Rice (en)
JoinDissent
  • Hegel (en)
JoinMajority
  • Cotter, Warner, Morris (en)
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
CourtSeal
  • Seal_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_Montana.gif (en)
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
  • Robert Baxter, Stephen Speckart, M.D., C. Paul Loehnen, M.D., Lar Autio, M.D., George Risi Jr., M.D., and Compassion & Choices, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. State of Montana and Steve Bullock, Defendants and Appellants (en)
Litigants
  • Baxter, et al., v. Montana, et al. (en)
majority
  • Leaphart (en)
has abstract
  • Baxter v. Montana ist ein am Obersten Gerichtshof des US-Bundesstaates Montana am 2. September 2009 verhandelter Fall zur Frage ob die Verfassung des Staates Montana unheilbar kranken Personen ein Recht auf den Erwerb tödlicher Medikamente zum Zweck der vorzeitigen Beendigung des eigenen Lebens verleiht. (de)
  • Baxter v. Montana, is a Montana Supreme Court case, argued on September 2, 2009, and decided on December 31, 2009, that addressed the question of whether the state's constitution guaranteed terminally ill patients a right to lethal prescription medication from their physicians. The Montana Supreme Court sidestepped the question of if medical aid in dying is guaranteed under Montana State Constitution, but it instead ruled, on narrower grounds, that neither legal precedent nor the state's statute deem such assistance to be against public policy or illegal. Montana is one of ten states in which aid in dying is authorized. The others are California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington; it is authorized in the District of Columbia as well. (en)
CitationNew
  • MT DA 09-0051, 2009 MT 449 (en)
CourtName
  • Montana Supreme Court (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software