About: Brumfield v. Cain     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FBrumfield_v._Cain&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Brumfield v. Cain, 576 U.S. 305 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that because Brumfield satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins v. Virginia claim considered on the merits in federal court.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Brumfield v. Cain (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Brumfield v. Cain, 576 U.S. 305 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that because Brumfield satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins v. Virginia claim considered on the merits in federal court. (en)
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Kevan Brumfield v. Burl Cain, Warden (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
Subsequent
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
Dissent
  • Thomas (en)
  • Alito (en)
docket
JoinDissent
  • Roberts (en)
  • Roberts, Scalia, Alito (en)
JoinMajority
  • Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan (en)
LawsApplied
  • U.S. Const. amend. VIII; (en)
OpinionAnnouncement
OralArgument
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
USPage
USVol
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
  • Brumfield v. Cain, (en)
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
  • Kevan Brumfield v. Burl Cain, Warden (en)
Holding
  • Because Brumfield satisfied §2254’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins claim considered on the merits in federal court. (en)
justia
Litigants
  • Brumfield v. Cain (en)
majority
  • Sotomayor (en)
other source
  • Supreme Court (en)
other url
has abstract
  • Brumfield v. Cain, 576 U.S. 305 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that because Brumfield satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins v. Virginia claim considered on the merits in federal court. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 56 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software