Brumfield v. Cain, 576 U.S. 305 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that because Brumfield satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins v. Virginia claim considered on the merits in federal court.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| |
rdfs:comment
| - Brumfield v. Cain, 576 U.S. 305 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that because Brumfield satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins v. Virginia claim considered on the merits in federal court. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Kevan Brumfield v. Burl Cain, Warden (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
Subsequent
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
docket
| |
JoinDissent
| - Roberts (en)
- Roberts, Scalia, Alito (en)
|
JoinMajority
| - Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan (en)
|
LawsApplied
| - U.S. Const. amend. VIII; (en)
|
OpinionAnnouncement
| |
OralArgument
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Kevan Brumfield v. Burl Cain, Warden (en)
|
Holding
| - Because Brumfield satisfied §2254’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins claim considered on the merits in federal court. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| |
majority
| |
other source
| |
other url
| |
has abstract
| - Brumfield v. Cain, 576 U.S. 305 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that because Brumfield satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins v. Virginia claim considered on the merits in federal court. (en)
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |