About: Byers v Saudi National Bank

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Byers v Saudi National Bank Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FByers_v_Saudi_National_Bank&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Byers v Saudi National Bank [2022] EWCA Civ 43 is a decision of the English Court of Appeal in the long running litigation between the liquidators of SAAD Investments Company Limited and various parties relating to the alleged defrauding of the insolvent company by one of its principals. The court was also required to rule on whether it was appropriate to apply a 'block discount' to the valuation of the shares when assessing damages. Although the Court of Appeal expressed an opinion on this matter, because the claim failed this part of judgment did not have any effect between the parties.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Byers v Saudi National Bank (en)
rdfs:comment	Byers v Saudi National Bank [2022] EWCA Civ 43 is a decision of the English Court of Appeal in the long running litigation between the liquidators of SAAD Investments Company Limited and various parties relating to the alleged defrauding of the insolvent company by one of its principals. The court was also required to rule on whether it was appropriate to apply a 'block discount' to the valuation of the shares when assessing damages. Although the Court of Appeal expressed an opinion on this matter, because the claim failed this part of judgment did not have any effect between the parties. (en)
name	Byers v The Saudi National Bank (en)
dcterms:subject	2022 in British law English conflict of laws case law English trusts case law 2022 in case law
Wikipage page ID	70018935 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1104415136 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Ben McFarlane Robert Reed, Baron Reed of Allermuir Roundell Palmer, 1st Earl of Selborne Samba (bank) Sarah Asplin Saudi National Bank (bank) 2022 in British law Jonathan Sumption, Lord Sumption Void (law) Insolvency Act 1986 Conflict of laws Andrew Popplewell Board of directors English conflict of laws case law Cayman Islands Timothy Fancourt Court of Appeal of England and Wales Law Quarterly Review Liquidator (law) Akers v Samba Financial Group Barnes v Addy Cayman Islands bankruptcy law Dishonest assistance Knowing receipt Asset freezing English trusts case law Kim Lewison Supreme Court of the United Kingdom El Ajou v Dollar Land Holdings plc 2022 in case law Guy Newey Trust (law) Saudi Arabian law Block discount
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2022/43.pdf
sameAs	Byers v Saudi National Bank Byers v Saudi National Bank
transcripts	https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2022/43.pdf
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_British_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Date dbt:Cite_bailii dbt:Infobox_court_case
caption	Riyadh (en)
citations	[2022] EWCA Civ 43 (en)
court	Court of Appeal of England and Wales
full name	Mark Byers, Hugh Dickson and SAAD Investments Company Limited v The Saudi National Bank (en)
imagesize	200 (xsd:integer)
judges	Newey LJ, Asplin LJ and Popplewell LJ (en)
keywords	(en) knowing receipt (en) dishonest assistance (en) proof of foreign law (en) share valuations (en)
has abstract	Byers v Saudi National Bank [2022] EWCA Civ 43 is a decision of the English Court of Appeal in the long running litigation between the liquidators of SAAD Investments Company Limited and various parties relating to the alleged defrauding of the insolvent company by one of its principals. The issues which the Court of Appeal had to determine were limited because of certain procedural irregularities in the way that the defendant, the Samba Financial Group, had conducted its defence. However, the central allegation was that the bank had knowingly received certain very valuable securities in Saudi Arabian companies which were beneficially owned by SAAD Investments Company Limited in breach of trust. However, because Saudi Arabian law did not recognise the concept of a trust, and did not have a system of conflict of laws, the defendants argued that the claim must necessarily fail. The defendants succeeded both in the High Court and in the Court of Appeal. The court was also required to rule on whether it was appropriate to apply a 'block discount' to the valuation of the shares when assessing damages. Although the Court of Appeal expressed an opinion on this matter, because the claim failed this part of judgment did not have any effect between the parties. (en)
date decided	2022-01-27 (xsd:date)
number of judges	3 (xsd:integer)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Byers_v_Saudi_National_Bank?oldid=1104415136&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	18156 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Byers_v_Saudi_National_Bank
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Akers v Samba Financial Group Knowing receipt
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Byers_v_Saudi_National_Bank

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software