About: Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCanadian_Egg_Marketing_Agency_v_Richardson&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 157 is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on standing to challenge a law as a violation of the Constitution of Canada. The Court expanded the exception first established in R. v. Big M Drug Mart to allow corporations to invoke the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in civil litigation. The corporation had claimed rights to freedom of association and freedom of movement under section 2(d) and section 6 of the Charter.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson (en)
rdfs:comment	Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 157 is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on standing to challenge a law as a violation of the Constitution of Canada. The Court expanded the exception first established in R. v. Big M Drug Mart to allow corporations to invoke the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in civil litigation. The corporation had claimed rights to freedom of association and freedom of movement under section 2(d) and section 6 of the Charter. (en)
dct:subject	1998 in Canadian case law Section Two Charter case law Eggs (food) Supreme Court of Canada cases
Wikipage page ID	4637580 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	858718774 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	1998 in Canadian case law Constitution of Canada Standing (law) Section Two Charter case law List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Lamer Court) Court of Appeal for the Northwest Territories Eggs (food) Supreme Court of Canada cases Supreme Court of Canada Freedom of association Freedom of movement Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Manitoba (AG) v Manitoba Egg and Poultry Association Reference Re Agricultural Products Marketing Section Two of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section Six of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms R. v. Big M Drug Mart
sameAs	Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Canada-law-stub dbt:Infobox_SCC dbt:Lexum-scc2
Dissent	McLachlin J. (en)
docket	25192 (xsd:integer)
JoinDissent	Major J. (en)
JoinMajority	Lamer C.J. and L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, and Binnie JJ. (en)
citations	[1998] 3 S.C.R. 157 (en)
history	Judgment against the Canadian Egg Marketing Agency in the Court of Appeal for the Northwest Territories. (en)
majority	Iacobucci and Bastarache JJ. (en)
ratio	#Corporations who are defendants in civil litigation instigated by the state have the right to raise an argument under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. #In regards to section 6 of the Charter, sections 6 and 6 should be read together as forming one right. #The purpose of the mobility rights under section 6 of the Charter is to protect against human rights discrimination, not economic discrimination. #The mobility rights under section 6 of the Charter include the ability to create wealth in another province, not just the ability to physically move to another province. (en)
has abstract	Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 157 is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on standing to challenge a law as a violation of the Constitution of Canada. The Court expanded the exception first established in R. v. Big M Drug Mart to allow corporations to invoke the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in civil litigation. The corporation had claimed rights to freedom of association and freedom of movement under section 2(d) and section 6 of the Charter. (en)
case-name	Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson (en)
decided-date	1998-11-05 (xsd:date)
full-case-name	Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v. Pineview Poultry Products Ltd. and Frank Richardson operating as Northern Poultry (en)
heard-date	1998-03-19 (xsd:date)
ruling	Appeal allowed (en)
SCC	1998 (xsd:integer)
gold:hypernym	Decision
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Canadian_Egg_Marketing_Agency_v_Richardson?oldid=858718774&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	2595 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Canadian_Egg_Marketing_Agency_v_Richardson
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v. Richardson List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Lamer Court) Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Bastarache Reference re Agricultural Products Marketing Manitoba (AG) v Manitoba Egg and Poultry Association
is Wikipage redirect of	Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v. Richardson
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Canadian_Egg_Marketing_Agency_v_Richardson

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git145 as of Aug 30 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 53 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software