About: Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCedar_Point_Nursery_v._Hassid&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving eminent domain and labor relations. In its decision, the Court held that a regulation made pursuant to the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act that required agricultural employers to allow labor organizers to regularly access their property for the purposes of union recruitment constituted a per se taking under the Fifth Amendment. Consequently, the regulation may not be enforced unless “just compensation” is provided to the employers.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (en)
rdfs:comment	Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving eminent domain and labor relations. In its decision, the Court held that a regulation made pursuant to the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act that required agricultural employers to allow labor organizers to regularly access their property for the purposes of union recruitment constituted a per se taking under the Fifth Amendment. Consequently, the regulation may not be enforced unless “just compensation” is provided to the employers. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Cedar Point Nursery and Fowler Packing Company, Inc. v. Victoria Hassid, et al. (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court United States labor case law Takings Clause case law 2021 in United States case law
Wikipage page ID	67175252 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1096817545 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	California Supreme Court Samuel Alito Sandra Segal Ikuta New England Legal Foundation Brett Kavanaugh John Roberts Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City Richard Paez California Agricultural Labor Relations Act Declaratory judgment Injunction United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court United States labor case law Clarence Thomas Edward Leavy Elena Kagan Elizabeth Prelogar Constitutional Accountability Center Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. Stephen Breyer Eminent domain dbr:Wikt:per_se Buckeye Institute Cato Institute Takings Clause case law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California William A. Fletcher AFL–CIO Amy Coney Barrett Pacific Legal Foundation Teamsters 2021 in United States case law Supreme Court of the United States Collective bargaining Dorris, California Sonia Sotomayor Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Institute for Justice Neil Gorsuch Service Employees International Union United Farm Workers of America Western Growers Association Mountain States Legal Foundation Americans for Prosperity Foundation Chamber of Commerce of the United States Pelican Institute for Public Policy United Food & Commercial Workers U.S. Constitution
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/594/20-107/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/20-107 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-107_ihdj.pdf
sameAs	Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:Ussc dbt:US5thAmendment
Dissent	Breyer (en)
docket	20 (xsd:integer)
JoinDissent	Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
JoinMajority	Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett (en)
LawsApplied	Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
OralArgument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/20-107
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/20-107
USPage	___ (en)
USVol	594 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-03-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2021 (xsd:integer)
case	Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, (en)
DecideDate	0001-06-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2021 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Cedar Point Nursery and Fowler Packing Company, Inc. v. Victoria Hassid, et al. (en)
Holding	The California Agricultural Labor Relations Act of 1975, which grants labor organizations an uncompensated "right to take access" to an agricultural employer’s property in order to solicit support for unionization, effects a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/594/20-107/
Litigants	Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (en)
majority	Roberts (en)
other source	Supreme Court (en)
other url	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-107_ihdj.pdf
has abstract	Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving eminent domain and labor relations. In its decision, the Court held that a regulation made pursuant to the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act that required agricultural employers to allow labor organizers to regularly access their property for the purposes of union recruitment constituted a per se taking under the Fifth Amendment. Consequently, the regulation may not be enforced unless “just compensation” is provided to the employers. (en)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software