About: Connelly v DPP

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Connelly v DPP Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:CyclingRace, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/4T3eaMExpY

Connelly v DPP [1964] AC 1254 was a landmark appeal whereby the highest court set out the way in which peripheral double jeopardy trials can take place in British law. It was ruled such proceedings should only be stayed where a retrial would be an abuse of process that violated objective standards of fairness and hampered the rights of the defendant. Connelly had been tried for murder, while in the commission of a robbery, and was found guilty despite a defence revolving around a lack of intent for murder. Connelly then appealed to the Court of Appeal, where his conviction was overturned and he was acquitted of murder for lack of proveable intent to kill or cause serious injury at the moment or leading up to the killing and the indictment reduced to robbery. Connelly pleaded autrefois acqu

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	cycling race
rdfs:label	Connelly v DPP (en)
rdfs:comment	Connelly v DPP [1964] AC 1254 was a landmark appeal whereby the highest court set out the way in which peripheral double jeopardy trials can take place in British law. It was ruled such proceedings should only be stayed where a retrial would be an abuse of process that violated objective standards of fairness and hampered the rights of the defendant. Connelly had been tried for murder, while in the commission of a robbery, and was found guilty despite a defence revolving around a lack of intent for murder. Connelly then appealed to the Court of Appeal, where his conviction was overturned and he was acquitted of murder for lack of proveable intent to kill or cause serious injury at the moment or leading up to the killing and the indictment reduced to robbery. Connelly pleaded autrefois acqu (en)
name	R v Connelly (en)
foaf:depiction
dct:subject	1964 in case law 1964 in British law English criminal case law House of Lords cases
Wikipage page ID	23581194 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1082945248 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Double jeopardy 1964 in case law Edward Pearce, Baron Pearce Murder 1964 in British law English criminal case law House of Lords cases Appeal (law) Robbery Judicial Committee of the House of Lords
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://archive.org/details/rightsrevolution0065eppc%7Curl-access=registration%7Cpublisher=University
sameAs	Connelly v DPP Connelly v DPP Connelly v DPP
subsequent actions	None (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Cite_book dbt:Italic_title dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:English_case_infobox
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Francisco_de_Goya_-_Friar_Pedro_Offers_Shoes_to_El_Maragato_and_Prepares_to_Push_Aside_His_Gun.jpg?width=300
citations	[1964] AC 1254; [1964] 2 WLR 1145; [1964] 2 All ER 401; 48 Cr App R 183 (en)
court	House of Lords (en)
full name	Connelly v Director of Public Prosecution (en)
judges	Lord Reid, Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest, Lord Hodson, Lord Devlin, Lord Pearce (en)
keywords	(en) robbery (en) murder (en) double jeopardy (en) estoppel (en) per rem judicatam (en) quashed conviction (en) reinstating other charge into fresh indictment (en)
has abstract	Connelly v DPP [1964] AC 1254 was a landmark appeal whereby the highest court set out the way in which peripheral double jeopardy trials can take place in British law. It was ruled such proceedings should only be stayed where a retrial would be an abuse of process that violated objective standards of fairness and hampered the rights of the defendant. Connelly had been tried for murder, while in the commission of a robbery, and was found guilty despite a defence revolving around a lack of intent for murder. Connelly then appealed to the Court of Appeal, where his conviction was overturned and he was acquitted of murder for lack of proveable intent to kill or cause serious injury at the moment or leading up to the killing and the indictment reduced to robbery. Connelly pleaded autrefois acquit, or double jeopardy, but the argument was rejected and he was able to be convicted of robbery. It is ruled that offences of murder and robbery differ enough in fact and in law" that charges for both offences must together fall or stand. The moral sphere in which law founded demands in that the public interest (and where a custodial or electronic tagging sentence is imposed, a period of enhanced protection of the public) that robbers do not go without a sentence by way of justice. (en)
Cases cited	R v Norton [1910] 2 KB 496 ; R v Chairman, County of London Quarter Sessions, Ex parte Downes [1954] 1 QB 1, DC ; rules of practice disapproved in: R v Large 55 TLR 470 and R v Jones [1918] 1 KB 416; 12 other cases considered (en)
date decided	1964-04-21 (xsd:date)
Legislation cited	Criminal Appeal Act 1907 (en)
prior actions	R v Connelly (en) R v Connelly 30 Sep 1963 [1964] AC 1254 (en)
gold:hypernym	Trial
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Connelly_v_DPP?oldid=1082945248&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	3472 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Connelly_v_DPP
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	English criminal law R v Davis Double jeopardy
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Connelly_v_DPP

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software