In psychometrics, criterion validity, or criterion-related validity, is the extent to which an operationalization of a construct, such as a test, relates to, or predicts, a theoretical representation of the construct—the criterion. Criterion validity is often divided into concurrent and predictive validity based on the timing of measurement for the "predictor" and outcome. Concurrent validity refers to a comparison between the measure in question and an outcome assessed at the same time. Standards for Educational & Psychological Tests states, "concurrent validity reflects only the status quo at a particular time." Predictive validity, on the other hand, compares the measure in question with an outcome assessed at a later time. Although concurrent and predictive validity are similar, it is
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:label
| - Criterion validity (en)
- Trafność kryterialna (pl)
- 效標效度 (zh)
|
| rdfs:comment
| - 效標效度（英語：criterion validity、concrete validity），在心理統計學中指的是一個測驗方法多大程度的與某件事的結果相關。效標效度常被分為和預測效度。 (zh)
- In psychometrics, criterion validity, or criterion-related validity, is the extent to which an operationalization of a construct, such as a test, relates to, or predicts, a theoretical representation of the construct—the criterion. Criterion validity is often divided into concurrent and predictive validity based on the timing of measurement for the "predictor" and outcome. Concurrent validity refers to a comparison between the measure in question and an outcome assessed at the same time. Standards for Educational & Psychological Tests states, "concurrent validity reflects only the status quo at a particular time." Predictive validity, on the other hand, compares the measure in question with an outcome assessed at a later time. Although concurrent and predictive validity are similar, it is (en)
- Trafność kryterialna – określa w jakim stopniu wyniki testu psychologicznego są powiązane z jakimś zewnętrznym kryterium (zmienną nie mierzoną bezpośrednio przez test). Na kryterium powinno się wybierać zachowanie/właściwość, o której chcemy wnioskować na podstawie wyników danego testu, a które nie jest bezpośrednio mierzone testem i dotyczy innej zmiennej niż ta, do której pomiaru skonstruowano test. Kryterium powinno dawać rzetelne wyniki i być adekwatne z punktu widzenia tego, co mierzy dany test. Wyróżniamy dwa rodzaje trafności kryterialnej: (pl)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Wikipage page ID
| |
| Wikipage revision ID
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
| sameAs
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| has abstract
| - In psychometrics, criterion validity, or criterion-related validity, is the extent to which an operationalization of a construct, such as a test, relates to, or predicts, a theoretical representation of the construct—the criterion. Criterion validity is often divided into concurrent and predictive validity based on the timing of measurement for the "predictor" and outcome. Concurrent validity refers to a comparison between the measure in question and an outcome assessed at the same time. Standards for Educational & Psychological Tests states, "concurrent validity reflects only the status quo at a particular time." Predictive validity, on the other hand, compares the measure in question with an outcome assessed at a later time. Although concurrent and predictive validity are similar, it is cautioned to keep the terms and findings separated. "Concurrent validity should not be used as a substitute for predictive validity without an appropriate supporting rationale." Criterion validity is typically assessed by comparison with a gold standard test. An example of concurrent validity is a comparison of the scores of the CLEP College Algebra exam with course grades in college algebra to determine the degree to which scores on the CLEP are related to performance in a college algebra class. An example of predictive validity is IQ tests, it was originally developed predict future school performance. Another example is a comparison of scores on the SAT with first semester grade point average (GPA) in college; this assesses the degree to which SAT scores are predictive of college performance. (en)
- Trafność kryterialna – określa w jakim stopniu wyniki testu psychologicznego są powiązane z jakimś zewnętrznym kryterium (zmienną nie mierzoną bezpośrednio przez test). Na kryterium powinno się wybierać zachowanie/właściwość, o której chcemy wnioskować na podstawie wyników danego testu, a które nie jest bezpośrednio mierzone testem i dotyczy innej zmiennej niż ta, do której pomiaru skonstruowano test. Kryterium powinno dawać rzetelne wyniki i być adekwatne z punktu widzenia tego, co mierzy dany test. Trafność kryterialna jest wyrażana w postaci współczynnika korelacji między wynikiem testu a wartością zmiennej kryterialnej mierzonej innym narzędzie w tej samej grupie osób badanych. Wyróżniamy dwa rodzaje trafności kryterialnej:
* diagnostyczna – dotyczy pomiaru cechy aktualnie występującej u osoby badanej
* prognostyczna – dotyczy przewidywania przyszłego zachowania u osób badanych (pl)
- 效標效度（英語：criterion validity、concrete validity），在心理統計學中指的是一個測驗方法多大程度的與某件事的結果相關。效標效度常被分為和預測效度。 (zh)
|
| gold:hypernym
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
| is Wikipage redirect
of | |
| is Wikipage disambiguates
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)