About: Descôteaux v Mierzwinski     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:Place, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FDescôteaux_v_Mierzwinski&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Descôteaux v Mierzwinski, [1982] 1 SCR 860 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on solicitor-client privilege. The court reaffirmed the opinion in R. v. Solosky that privilege was a substantive right that even existed outside of a proceeding.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Descôteaux v Mierzwinski (en)
  • Descôteaux c. Mierzwinski (fr)
rdfs:comment
  • Descôteaux v Mierzwinski, [1982] 1 SCR 860 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on solicitor-client privilege. The court reaffirmed the opinion in R. v. Solosky that privilege was a substantive right that even existed outside of a proceeding. (en)
  • Descôteaux c. Mierzwinski est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada sur le secret professionnel de l'avocat. La cour a réaffirmé l'opinion contenue dans Solosky c. La Reine que ce privilège est un droit substantiel qui existe même en dehors d'une instance. (fr)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
Unanimous
  • Lamer J (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
docket
citations
  • [1982] 1 SCR 860 (en)
history
  • APPEAL from Descôteaux v Mierzwinski, [1980] 16 CR 188 , affirming Descôteaux v Mierzwinski, [1978] Que SC 792 (en)
has abstract
  • Descôteaux v Mierzwinski, [1982] 1 SCR 860 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on solicitor-client privilege. The court reaffirmed the opinion in R. v. Solosky that privilege was a substantive right that even existed outside of a proceeding. (en)
  • Descôteaux c. Mierzwinski est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada sur le secret professionnel de l'avocat. La cour a réaffirmé l'opinion contenue dans Solosky c. La Reine que ce privilège est un droit substantiel qui existe même en dehors d'une instance. (fr)
case-name
  • Descôteaux et al v Mierzwinski (en)
decided-date
full-case-name
  • Simon Descôteaux and Centre communautaire juridique de Montréal v Alexandre Mierzwinski (en)
heard-date
NotParticipating
  • Laskin CJ and McIntyre J (en)
ruling
  • Appeal dismissed (en)
SCC
gold:hypernym
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software