About: Dickerson v. United States

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Dickerson v. United States Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/3u88rLjuWT

Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000), upheld the requirement that the Miranda warning be read to criminal suspects and struck down a federal statute that purported to overrule Miranda v. Arizona (1966).

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRehnquistCourt yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Dickerson v. United States (en)
rdfs:comment	Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000), upheld the requirement that the Miranda warning be read to criminal suspects and struck down a federal statute that purported to overrule Miranda v. Arizona (1966). (en)
foaf:name	(en) Charles Thomas Dickerson, Petitioner v. United States (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Supreme Court cases Miranda warning case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court 2000 in United States case law
Wikipage page ID	3113796 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1120622595 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	University of Utah Interlocutory appeal United States Supreme Court cases Criminal Law Clarence Thomas England Miranda v. Arizona Miranda warning Antonin Scalia Arraignment Miranda warning case law Warren E. Burger William Rehnquist 4th Cir. United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court 2000 in United States case law L. Ed. 2d Coercion Arrest Marbury v. Madison Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 Federal district court E.D. Va. Miranda warnings Paul Cassell F.3d F. Supp. U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.aclu.org/scotus/1999/22423lgl20000220.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/166/667/629877/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/971/1023/1872690/ https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=12360733536043994298 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/530/428/ https://web.archive.org/web/20051227084020/http:/www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1999/0responses/99-5525.resp.html https://web.archive.org/web/20070315195349/http:/www.cjlf.org/briefs/DickrsnS.htm https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/118380/dickerson-v-united-states/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-5525.ZS.html https://www.oyez.org/cases/1999/99-5525 http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep530/usrep530428/usrep530428.pdf
sameAs	Dickerson v. United States Dickerson v. United States Dickerson v. United States Dickerson v. United States
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Essay-like dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Primary_sources dbt:Reflist dbt:USC dbt:Ussc
Dissent	Scalia (en)
JoinDissent	Thomas (en)
JoinMajority	Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
LawsApplied	U.S. Const. amend. V; (en)
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1999/99-5525
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	25920.0 (second)
USPage	428 (xsd:integer)
USVol	530 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-04-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2000 (xsd:integer)
case	Dickerson v. United States, (en)
courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/118380/dickerson-v-united-states/
DecideDate	0001-06-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2000 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Charles Thomas Dickerson, Petitioner v. United States (en)
Holding	The mandate of Miranda v. Arizona that a criminal suspect be advised of certain constitutional rights governs the admissibility at trial of the suspect's statements, not the requirement of that such statements simply be voluntarily given. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/530/428/
Litigants	Dickerson v. United States (en)
majority	Rehnquist (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep530/usrep530428/usrep530428.pdf
has abstract	Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000), upheld the requirement that the Miranda warning be read to criminal suspects and struck down a federal statute that purported to overrule Miranda v. Arizona (1966). The Court noted that neither party in the case advocated on behalf of the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 3501, the specific statute at issue in the case. Accordingly, it invited Paul Cassell, a former law clerk to Antonin Scalia and Warren E. Burger, to argue that perspective. Cassell was then a professor at the University of Utah law school; he was later appointed to, and subsequently resigned from, a federal district court judgeship in that state. (en)
cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-5525.ZS.html
googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=12360733536043994298

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3332 as of Dec 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 56 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software