About: Doré v Barreau du Québec

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Doré v Barreau du Québec Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FDoré_v_Barreau_du_Québec&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Doré v Barreau du Québec is an administrative law decision by the Supreme Court of Canada regarding how to apply the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to adjudicative decisions, as opposed to statutory law. The Court found that the test in R. v. Oakes (which is used to determine whether a law that infringes a section of the Charter is unconstitutional under section 1 of the Charter) does not apply to administrative law decisions, although there is "conceptual harmony" between the review for reasonableness and the Oakes framework. Instead, the question is whether the administrative decision is reasonable, in that it reflects a proportionate balancing of the Charter rights and values at play. In addition to the parties (Doré, the Barreau du Québec, the , and the Attorney General of Que

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Doré v Barreau du Québec (en)
rdfs:comment	Doré v Barreau du Québec is an administrative law decision by the Supreme Court of Canada regarding how to apply the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to adjudicative decisions, as opposed to statutory law. The Court found that the test in R. v. Oakes (which is used to determine whether a law that infringes a section of the Charter is unconstitutional under section 1 of the Charter) does not apply to administrative law decisions, although there is "conceptual harmony" between the review for reasonableness and the Oakes framework. Instead, the question is whether the administrative decision is reasonable, in that it reflects a proportionate balancing of the Charter rights and values at play. In addition to the parties (Doré, the Barreau du Québec, the , and the Attorney General of Que (en)
dct:subject	2012 in Canadian case law Canadian administrative case law Canadian freedom of expression case law Supreme Court of Canada cases Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law
Wikipage page ID	35228284 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	957719733 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Canadian Civil Liberties Association Canadian Judicial Council Quebec Court of Appeal Rosalie Abella R. v. Oakes 2012 in Canadian case law Canadian administrative case law Federation of Law Societies of Canada Canadian freedom of expression case law Supreme Court of Canada cases Supreme Court of Canada Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Canadian administrative law Section One of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Standard of review Section Two of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Superior Court of Quebec Barreau du Québec Court of Appeal for Quebec Attorney General of Quebec dbr:Tribunal_des_professions dbr:Young_Bar_Association_of_Montreal
sameAs	Doré v Barreau du Québec Doré v Barreau du Québec Doré v Barreau du Québec
Unanimous	Abella J. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Infobox_SCC dbt:Lexum-scc
docket	33594 (xsd:integer)
citations	2012 (xsd:integer)
history	Judgment against Doré in the Court of Appeal for Quebec. (en)
ratio	R. v. Oakes does not apply to Charter issues in the context of administrative law. Instead, the question is whether the administrative decision reflects a proportionate balancing of the Charter rights and values at play. (en)
has abstract	Doré v Barreau du Québec is an administrative law decision by the Supreme Court of Canada regarding how to apply the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to adjudicative decisions, as opposed to statutory law. The Court found that the test in R. v. Oakes (which is used to determine whether a law that infringes a section of the Charter is unconstitutional under section 1 of the Charter) does not apply to administrative law decisions, although there is "conceptual harmony" between the review for reasonableness and the Oakes framework. Instead, the question is whether the administrative decision is reasonable, in that it reflects a proportionate balancing of the Charter rights and values at play. In addition to the parties (Doré, the Barreau du Québec, the , and the Attorney General of Quebec), the Court heard from the following intervenors: the Federation of Law Societies of Canada, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, and the . (en)
case-name	Doré v Barreau du Québec (en)
decided-date	2012-03-22 (xsd:date)
full-case-name	Gilles Doré v. Pierre Bernard, in his capacity as Assistant Syndic of the Barreau du Québec, Tribunal des professions and Attorney General of Quebec (en)
heard-date	2011-01-26 (xsd:date)
NotParticipating	Deschamps and Charron JJ. (en)
ruling	Appeal dismissed. (en)
SCC	2008 (xsd:integer)
gold:hypernym	Decision
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Doré_v_Barreau_du_Québec?oldid=957719733&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	8500 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Doré_v_Barreau_du_Québec
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Dore Dore v. Barreau du Quebec Dore v Barreau du Quebec Doré v. Barreau du Québec List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (McLachlin Court) Test (law) Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
is Wikipage redirect of	Dore v. Barreau du Quebec Dore v Barreau du Quebec Doré v. Barreau du Québec
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Doré_v_Barreau_du_Québec

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git145 as of Aug 30 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 53 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software