About: Duke v R

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Duke v R Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FDuke_v_R&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Duke v R [1972] S.C.R. 917 was a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the Canadian Bill of Rights, concerning the right of an accused to make full answer and defence to a criminal charge.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Duke v R (en)
rdfs:comment	Duke v R [1972] S.C.R. 917 was a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the Canadian Bill of Rights, concerning the right of an accused to make full answer and defence to a criminal charge. (en)
dcterms:subject	1972 in Canadian case law Supreme Court of Canada cases Canadian civil rights case law
Wikipage page ID	6172535 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1113106284 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Bora Laskin Liberty Presumption of innocence Criminal Code (Canada) Common law Fundamental justice 1972 in Canadian case law Drunk driving Section Seven of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Breathalyzer Good faith Right to life Gérald Fauteux Court of Appeal for Ontario Supreme Court of Canada cases Chief Justice of Canada Canadian civil rights case law Supreme Court of Canada Natural justice Canadian Bill of Rights Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Security of person Re B.C. Motor Vehicle Act Right to a fair trial dbr:Denial_of_request
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/1972/1972scc10003.html
sameAs	Duke v R Duke v R Duke v R
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Infobox_SCC dbt:Dead_link dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist
JoinMajority	Abbott, Martland, Judson, Ritchie, Hall, and Pigeon JJ. (en)
bot	InternetArchiveBot (en)
citations	[1972] S.C.R. 917; 1972 CanLII 2 (en)
date	December 2016 (en)
fix-attempted	yes (en)
history	Judgment for the Crown in the Court of Appeal for Ontario (en)
majority	Fauteux C.J. (en)
ratio	The denial of the Crown to grant access to evidence to the accused does not violate the right to a fair trial if it is in accordance with the law; fundamental justice under the Canadian Bill of Rights is the same as natural justice. (en)
has abstract	Duke v R [1972] S.C.R. 917 was a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the Canadian Bill of Rights, concerning the right of an accused to make full answer and defence to a criminal charge. (en)
case-name	Duke v R (en)
Concurrence	Laskin J. (en)
decided-date	1972-06-29 (xsd:date)
full-case-name	George Clinton Duke and Her Majesty The Queen (en)
heard-date	0001-03-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
JoinConcurrence	Spence J. (en)
SCC	1970 (xsd:integer)
gold:hypernym	Decision
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Duke_v_R?oldid=1113106284&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	5588 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Duke_v_R
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Richards Court through Fauteux Court) Duke v. The Queen Reference Re BC Motor Vehicle Act
is Wikipage redirect of	Duke v. The Queen
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Duke_v_R

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 50 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software