Encino Motorcars v. Navarro, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a Supreme Court of the United States case addressing overtime pay. Specifically at issue is whether automotive service advisors are eligible for overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Encino Motorcars v. Navarro (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Encino Motorcars v. Navarro, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a Supreme Court of the United States case addressing overtime pay. Specifically at issue is whether automotive service advisors are eligible for overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Hector Navarro, ''et al' (en)
|
dct:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
Subsequent
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| - Thomas (en)
- Ginsburg (en)
|
docket
| |
JoinDissent
| - Alito (en)
- Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
|
JoinMajority
| - Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
- Roberts, Kennedy, Alito, Gorsuch (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Encino Motorcars v. Navarro, (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Hector Navarro, ''et al' (en)
|
Holding
| - Automotive service advisors are considered exempt from overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act, reversing the decision of the Ninth Circuit (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Encino Motorcars v. Navarro (en)
|
majority
| |
other source
| |
other url
| |
has abstract
| - Encino Motorcars v. Navarro, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a Supreme Court of the United States case addressing overtime pay. Specifically at issue is whether automotive service advisors are eligible for overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The case had been heard twice by the Supreme Court. In the first pass, the Court had vacated a previous decision by the Ninth Circuit Appeals Court which relied on an interpretive ruling on the Fair Labor Standards Act provided by the United States Department of Labor to states that service advisors were not exempt, and remanded the case back to the Ninth Circuit. On rehearing, the Ninth Circuit still found the same; its decision was reversed in the Supreme Court's 2018 ruling. (en)
|
googlescholar
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |