Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank, 527 U.S. 627 (1999), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States relating to the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank, 527 U.S. 627 (1999), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States relating to the doctrine of sovereign immunity. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank and United States (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
JoinDissent
| - Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
|
JoinMajority
| - O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank, (en)
|
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank and United States (en)
|
Holding
| - The Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act did not constitutionally abrogate the states' sovereign immunity. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank, 527 U.S. 627 (1999), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States relating to the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Florida Prepaid was a companion case to the similarly named (but not to be confused) College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board, 527 U.S. 666 (1999). Where College Savings Bank was an action brought under the Lanham Act, Florida Prepaid was a concurrent action brought under the . Although it was unnecessary to reach the question of whether Congress had validly abrogated Florida's sovereign immunity in College Savings Bank, the question was unavoidable in Florida Prepaid. (en)
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |