Hadley & Anor v Baxendale & Ors [1854] EWHC J70 is a leading English contract law case. It sets the leading rule to determine consequential damages from a breach of contract: a breaching party is liable for all losses that the contracting parties should have foreseen. However, if the other party has special knowledge that the party-in-breach does not, the breaching party is only liable for the losses that he could have foreseen on the information available to him.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Hadley v Baxendale (en)
- 하들리 대 박센데일 사건 (ko)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Hadley & Anor v Baxendale & Ors [1854] EWHC J70 is a leading English contract law case. It sets the leading rule to determine consequential damages from a breach of contract: a breaching party is liable for all losses that the contracting parties should have foreseen. However, if the other party has special knowledge that the party-in-breach does not, the breaching party is only liable for the losses that he could have foreseen on the information available to him. (en)
- 하들리 대 박센데일 사건(Hadley v. Baxendale, 1854)은 유명한 영미법 판례로 계약위반에 대한 손해배상액은 계약체결당시 예견가능해야 한다는 법리를 확립한 것으로 유명하다. 통상 예견가능성이 없는 손해는 배상대상에서 제외된다. (ko)
|
name
| - Hadley & Anor v Baxendale & Ors (en)
|
foaf:depiction
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
transcripts
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
thumbnail
| |
citations
| - [1854] EWHC J70, 156 ER 145, 9 ExCh 341, 23 LJ Ex 179, 18 Jur 358, [1843-60] All ER Rep 461 (en)
|
court
| |
judges
| - Parke B, Alderson B, Platt B and Martin B (en)
|
keywords
| - Breach of contract, remoteness (en)
|
has abstract
| - Hadley & Anor v Baxendale & Ors [1854] EWHC J70 is a leading English contract law case. It sets the leading rule to determine consequential damages from a breach of contract: a breaching party is liable for all losses that the contracting parties should have foreseen. However, if the other party has special knowledge that the party-in-breach does not, the breaching party is only liable for the losses that he could have foreseen on the information available to him. (en)
- 하들리 대 박센데일 사건(Hadley v. Baxendale, 1854)은 유명한 영미법 판례로 계약위반에 대한 손해배상액은 계약체결당시 예견가능해야 한다는 법리를 확립한 것으로 유명하다. 통상 예견가능성이 없는 손해는 배상대상에서 제외된다. (ko)
|
date decided
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |