About: Implicit divestiture

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Implicit divestiture Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:Disease, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/6pPgjyGwDC

Implicit divestiture is the ability of the Supreme Court of the United States to solely determine the extent of an Indian Nation's sovereignty, an approach, of recent decades, to federal Indian policy, which is contradictory to U.S. Constitutional protections of Native American sovereignty.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	disease
rdfs:label	Implicit divestiture (en)
rdfs:comment	Implicit divestiture is the ability of the Supreme Court of the United States to solely determine the extent of an Indian Nation's sovereignty, an approach, of recent decades, to federal Indian policy, which is contradictory to U.S. Constitutional protections of Native American sovereignty. (en)
dcterms:subject	Supreme Court of the United States
Wikipage page ID	22048794 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	898461446 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Supreme Court of the United States Montana v. United States Cherokee Nation v. Georgia Supreme Court of the United States Nevada v. Hicks Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe Worcester v. Georgia Johnson v. McIntosh
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/hrj/iss13/duthu.shtml%3E http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1777/%3E http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page%3Fhandle=hein.journals/dcujl5&div=5&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults%3E
sameAs	Implicit divestiture Implicit divestiture Implicit divestiture
has abstract	Implicit divestiture is the ability of the Supreme Court of the United States to solely determine the extent of an Indian Nation's sovereignty, an approach, of recent decades, to federal Indian policy, which is contradictory to U.S. Constitutional protections of Native American sovereignty. The issue of indigenous sovereignty rights and their protections under federal trust in the United States was asserted in the 19th century, through Supreme Court cases called the Marshall Trilogy of Johnson v. McIntosh, Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, and Worcester v. Georgia. As Indian law writer Andrew Fletcher terms it, the "colonial trilogy" of Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, Montana v. United States, and Nevada v. Hicks undermined tribal sovereignty, through their introduction of "implicit divestiture." Its application in respect to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples is yet to be tested. (en)
gold:hypernym	Ability
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Implicit_divestiture?oldid=898461446&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	1697 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Implicit_divestiture
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Implicit_divestiture

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3332 as of Dec 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 71 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software