• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Jehoash Inscription     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:Wikicat2003Hoaxes, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Act100030358yago:Activity100407535yago:Communication100033020yago:Deception100752431yago:Event100029378yago:Falsification100751145yago:Fraud100753685yago:Inscription106405699yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:WikicatHebrewInscriptionsyago:WikicatHoaxesInIsraelyago:WikicatInscriptionsOfDisputedOriginyago:Writing106362953yago:WrittenCommunication106349220yago:Wrongdoing100732746yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntityprogramming languageyago:Trickery100752954yago:Wikicat2003Hoaxes New Facet based on Instances of this Class

The Jehoash Inscription is the name of a controversial artifact rumored to have surfaced in a construction site or Muslim cemetery near the Temple Mount of Jerusalem. The inscription describes repairs made to the temple in Jerusalem by Jehoash, son of King Ahaziah of Judah, and corresponds to the account in 2 Kings chapter 12. While some scholars support the antiquity of the patina, which in turn, strengthens the assertion that the inscription is authentic, the Israel Antiquities Authority has asserted that the inscription is a modern-day forgery.