About: Jennings v Rice     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FJennings_v_Rice&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Jennings v Rice (EWCA Civ 159; 2002) is an English land law case concerning proprietary estoppel.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Jennings v Rice (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Jennings v Rice (EWCA Civ 159; 2002) is an English land law case concerning proprietary estoppel. (en)
name
  • Jennings v Rice (en)
foaf:depiction
  • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Singapore_road_sign_-_Warning_-_Elderly_people.svg
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
transcripts
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
thumbnail
caption
  • This leading case concerned a vague promise to see the underpaid longstanding carer to an elderly person, who lacked the cash to continue paying him, "all right". (en)
citations
  • [2002] EWCA Civ 159 (en)
  • [2002] WTLR 367 (en)
  • [2003] 1 8 (en)
  • [2003] 1 FCR 501 (en)
  • [2003] 1 P & CR 100 (en)
court
  • Court of Appeal (en)
full name
  • Anthony Clifford Jennings v Arthur T Rice, Janet Wilson, Linda A. Marsh, Peter L Norris, Arthur E Norris & Patricia M Reed (en)
judges
  • Aldous LJ (en)
  • Mantell LJ (en)
  • Walker LJ (en)
keywords
  • Proprietary estoppel; quantum of award; carer and gardener; extent of detriment; estoppel based on words (en)
has abstract
  • Jennings v Rice (EWCA Civ 159; 2002) is an English land law case concerning proprietary estoppel. (en)
concurring
  • Mantell LJ (en)
date decided
decision by
  • Aldous LJ (en)
  • Walker LJ (en)
opinions
  • 'There is a clear line of authority from at least Crabb to the present day which establishes that once the elements of proprietary estoppel are established an equity arises. The value of that equity will depend upon all the circumstances including the expectation and the detriment. The task of the court is to do justice. The most essential requirement is that there must be proportionality between the expectation and the detriment.' Appeal dismissed 'with costs' (en)
prior actions
  • Appellant awarded £200,000 at first instance in the High Court before HHJ Weeks QC (en)
gold:hypernym
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 47 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software