• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: John Kettlewell     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatFellowsOfLincolnCollege,Oxford, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingpersonyago:Associate109816771yago:CausalAgent100007347yago:Clergyman109927451yago:Colleague109935990yago:Communicator109610660yago:Leader109623038yago:LivingThing100004258yago:Object100002684yago:Organism100004475yago:Peer109626238yago:Person100007846yago:PhysicalEntity100001930yago:Priest110470779yago:Writer110794014yago:YagoLegalActoryago:YagoLegalActorGeoyago:SpiritualLeader109505153yago:Whole100003553yago:WikicatEarlyModernChristianDevotionalWritersyago:WikicatEnglishAnglicanPriestsyago:WikicatFellowsOfLincolnCollege,Oxford New Facet based on Instances of this Class

John Kettlewell (10 March 1653 – 12 April 1695) was an English clergyman, nonjuror and devotional writer. He is now known for his arguments against William Sherlock, who had justified the change of monarch of 1688–89 and his own switch of sides in The Case of the Allegiance. According to J. P. Kenyon, Kettlewell's reply made a case "with which conformist Anglicans could only agree, because it was spiritual, while Sherlock's was resolutely aspiritual". He went on to attack defenders of the Glorious Revolution generally as proponents of fallacious contractarian theories.