About: Johnson v. United States (2015)

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Johnson v. United States (2015) Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/4rR5wps5Rn

Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled the Residual Clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act was unconstitutionally vague and in violation of due process.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Johnson v. United States (2015) (en)
rdfs:comment	Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled the Residual Clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act was unconstitutionally vague and in violation of due process. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Samuel James Johnson, Petitioner v. United States (en)
dct:subject	United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court 2015 in United States case law Armed Career Criminal Act case law
Wikipage page ID	47090698 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1054196180 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Sawed-off shotgun Begay v. United States List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 576 United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Due process United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 SCOTUSblog Stare decisis Stokeling v. United States 8th Cir. 2015 in United States case law Federal Bureau of Investigation James v. United States (2007) Armed Career Criminal Act Armed Career Criminal Act case law Chambers v. United States Justice Scalia L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States Sykes v. United States Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Certiorari Sessions v. Dimaya Vagueness doctrine F. App'x
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/13/07/123123U.pdf https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/576/13-7120/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2014/2014_13-7120/argument-1 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/13-7120 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-7120_p86b.pdf http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/johnson-v-united-states-3/
sameAs	Johnson v. United States (2015) Johnson v. United States (2015) Johnson v. United States (2015)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cn dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Listen dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:USC dbt:Usc dbt:Ussc
Dissent	Alito (en)
docket	13 (xsd:integer)
JoinMajority	Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
LawsApplied	Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Armed Career Criminal Act , (en)
OpinionAnnouncement	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-7120_p86b.pdf
OralArgument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2014/2014_13-7120/argument-1
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/13-7120
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	United States v. Johnson, 526 F. App'x 708 ; cert. granted, . (en)
USPage	591 (xsd:integer)
USVol	576 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-11-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2014 (xsd:integer)
case	Johnson v. United States, (en)
DecideDate	0001-06-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2015 (xsd:integer)
description	The case was reargued to address the question of whether or not the residual clause was unconstitutionally vague. (en) The Court first considered whether the state law banning possession of a sawed-off shot gun qualified as a "violent felony" under the residual clause. (en)
filename	Johnson v. United States oral arguments .mp3 (en) Johnson v. United States oral arguments.mp3 (en)
fullname	Samuel James Johnson, Petitioner v. United States (en)
Holding	The Residual Clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague and as a result one's due process rights are violated. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/576/13-7120/
Litigants	Johnson v. United States (en)
majority	Scalia (en)
other source	Supreme Court (en)
other url	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-7120_p86b.pdf
title	Initial oral arguments (en) Reargument five months later (en)
has abstract	Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled the Residual Clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act was unconstitutionally vague and in violation of due process. (en)
Concurrence	Thomas (en) Kennedy (en)
Overturned previous case	James v. United States & Sykes v. United States (en)
ReargueDate	0001-04-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ReargueYear	2015 (xsd:integer)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Johnson_v._United_States_(2015)?oldid=1054196180&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	8572 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
sound recording	dbr:Johnson_v._United_States_(2015)__Sound__1

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3332 as of Dec 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software