About: Kirsten v Bailey

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Kirsten v Bailey Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/7vm8KXBP7b

In Kirsten v Bailey, an important case in the South African law of succession, a testatrix made three wills. In the first and third, Bailey was nominated as the sole beneficiary of her estate; in the second will, Kirsten was nominated as the sole beneficiary. Kirsten challenged the validity of the third will. The effect of the ruling is that if a court declares the last in a series of wills to be invalid ab initio, the deceased is deemed to have died intestate. The court will not give effect to an earlier will, as it had already been revoked.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Kirsten v Bailey (en)
rdfs:comment	In Kirsten v Bailey, an important case in the South African law of succession, a testatrix made three wills. In the first and third, Bailey was nominated as the sole beneficiary of her estate; in the second will, Kirsten was nominated as the sole beneficiary. Kirsten challenged the validity of the third will. The effect of the ruling is that if a court declares the last in a series of wills to be invalid ab initio, the deceased is deemed to have died intestate. The court will not give effect to an earlier will, as it had already been revoked. (en)
dcterms:subject	South African case law Inheritance 1976 in South African law 1976 in case law
Wikipage page ID	40849158 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1084894708 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Beneficiary South African case law Estate (law) Inheritance 1976 in South African law Will and testament Duress 1976 in case law Will contest Heir Testatrix Intestate South African Law Reports South African law of succession Court of law Court ruling
sameAs	Kirsten v Bailey Kirsten v Bailey Kirsten v Bailey
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:SouthAfrica-case-law-stub
has abstract	In Kirsten v Bailey, an important case in the South African law of succession, a testatrix made three wills. In the first and third, Bailey was nominated as the sole beneficiary of her estate; in the second will, Kirsten was nominated as the sole beneficiary. Kirsten challenged the validity of the third will. The court held that Bailey had led the testatrix to believe that he would leave her unless she appointed him her sole heir. Thus, Kirsten had proved that the testatrix was unduly influenced, and accordingly lacked the requisite capacity. The testatrix therefore was held to have died intestate. The effect of the ruling is that if a court declares the last in a series of wills to be invalid ab initio, the deceased is deemed to have died intestate. The court will not give effect to an earlier will, as it had already been revoked. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Kirsten_v_Bailey?oldid=1084894708&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	1396 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Kirsten_v_Bailey
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Kirsten_v_Bailey

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3332 as of Dec 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 52 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software