About: Kloeckner v. Solis     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FKloeckner_v._Solis&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Kloeckner v. Solis, 568 U.S. 41 (2012), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving federal employee grievance procedures under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. The issue was whether a so-called "mixed case" involving both wrongful termination and discrimination claims should be appealed from the Merit Systems Protection Board to a federal district court or to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Kloeckner v. Solis (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Kloeckner v. Solis, 568 U.S. 41 (2012), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving federal employee grievance procedures under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. The issue was whether a so-called "mixed case" involving both wrongful termination and discrimination claims should be appealed from the Merit Systems Protection Board to a federal district court or to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (en)
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Carolyn M. Kloeckner v.Hilda L. Solis,Secretary of Labor (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
docket
JoinMajority
  • unanimous (en)
OralArgument
ParallelCitations
Prior
USPage
USVol
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
  • Kloeckner v. Solis, 568 U.S. 41 (en)
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
  • Carolyn M. Kloeckner v. Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor (en)
Holding
  • A federal employee who claims that an agency action appealable to the Merit Systems Protection Board violates an antidiscrimination statute listed in ยง7702 of the Civil Service Reform Act should seek judicial review in district court, not the Federal Circuit, regardless whether the MSPB decided her case on procedural grounds or on the merits. Eighth Circuit reversed and remanded. (en)
justia
Litigants
  • Kloeckner v. Solis (en)
majority
  • Kagan (en)
other source
  • Supreme Court (en)
other url
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 56 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software