About: Lehideux and Isorni v France

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Lehideux and Isorni v France Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FLehideux_and_Isorni_v_France&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Lehideux and Isorni v. France (case no. 55/1997/839/1045, application no. 24662/94, Publication 1998-VII, no. 92), was a case heard by the European Court of Human Rights on punishing statements praising collaborators. In a judgement handed down 23 September 1998, the court has held by fifteen votes against six that the conviction of applicants for their article in favour of Philippe Pétain was prescribed by law and pursued a legitimate aim, but wasn't necessary in a democratic society and therefore violated Article 10 (freedom of expression).

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Lehideux and Isorni v France (en)
rdfs:comment	Lehideux and Isorni v. France (case no. 55/1997/839/1045, application no. 24662/94, Publication 1998-VII, no. 92), was a case heard by the European Court of Human Rights on punishing statements praising collaborators. In a judgement handed down 23 September 1998, the court has held by fifteen votes against six that the conviction of applicants for their article in favour of Philippe Pétain was prescribed by law and pursued a legitimate aim, but wasn't necessary in a democratic society and therefore violated Article 10 (freedom of expression). (en)
dcterms:subject	Historical negationism European Court of Human Rights cases decided by the Grand Chamber European Court of Human Rights cases involving France Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights 1998 in case law Philippe Pétain
Wikipage page ID	4114915 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1058012377 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Historical negationism European Court of Human Rights cases decided by the Grand Chamber Council of Europe European Court of Human Rights cases involving France Collaborationism François Lehideux Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights 1998 in case law The Holocaust Association for the Defence of the Memory of Marshal Pétain Philippe Pétain Philippe Pétain Necessary in a democratic society European Convention on Human Rights dbr:Netherlands_Institute_of_Human_Rights
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://archive.today/20120715014552/http:/sim.law.uu.nl/SIM/CaseLaw/hof.nsf/0/2eb5afd8f89c9af6c12566900036cbf5%3FOpenDocument http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp%3Faction=html&documentId=696122&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
sameAs	Lehideux and Isorni v France Lehideux and Isorni v France Lehideux and Isorni v France
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Case-law-stub dbt:Fact dbt:In_lang dbt:Italic_title dbt:More_footnotes dbt:Historical_revisionism
Link from a Wikipa... related subject.	dbpedia-fr:Lehideux_et_Isorni_c._France
has abstract	Lehideux and Isorni v. France (case no. 55/1997/839/1045, application no. 24662/94, Publication 1998-VII, no. 92), was a case heard by the European Court of Human Rights on punishing statements praising collaborators. In a judgement handed down 23 September 1998, the court has held by fifteen votes against six that the conviction of applicants for their article in favour of Philippe Pétain was prescribed by law and pursued a legitimate aim, but wasn't necessary in a democratic society and therefore violated Article 10 (freedom of expression). Besides, the court has ruled that the case "does not belong to the category of clearly established historical facts – such as the Holocaust – whose negation or revision would be removed from the protection of Article 10 by Article 17" (Para. 47). In doing so the court has ruled that the protections in Article 17, the prohibition of abuse of rights, could restrict the right of free speech granted under Article 10. This ruling has had a direct influence on International treaty law. The "Additional Protocol to the Convention on cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems" requires participating States to criminalize the dissemination of racist and xenophobic material through computer systems, as well as of racist and xenophobic-motivated threats and insults. Article 8, Section 1 of the protocol specifically covers the denial of the Holocaust and other genocides recognised as such by other international courts set up since 1945 by relevant international legal instruments. The Council of Europe Explanatory Report of the protocol states "European Court of Human Rights has made it clear that the denial or revision of “clearly established historical facts – such as the Holocaust – […] would be removed from the protection of Article 10 by Article 17” of the ECHR (see in this context the Lehideux and Isorni judgment of 23 September 1998)". (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Lehideux_and_Isorni_v_France?oldid=1058012377&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	3873 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Lehideux_and_Isorni_v_France
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Lehideux Lehideux and Isorni v. France
is Wikipage redirect of	Lehideux and Isorni v. France
is Wikipage disambiguates of	Lehideux
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Lehideux_and_Isorni_v_France

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software