About: Love v Commonwealth

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Love v Commonwealth Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/5AYo7hysHx

Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth is a High Court of Australia case that held that Aboriginal Australians could not be classified as aliens under section 51(xix) of the Australian Constitution. The case was decided on 11 February 2020.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Love v Commonwealth (en)
rdfs:comment	Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth is a High Court of Australia case that held that Aboriginal Australians could not be classified as aliens under section 51(xix) of the Australian Constitution. The case was decided on 11 February 2020. (en)
name	Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth (en)
foaf:depiction
dct:subject	Australian constitutional law Indigenous Australian case law Rights in the Australian Constitution cases 2020 in Australian law 2020 in case law High Court of Australia cases Australian migration law Australian nationality law
Wikipage page ID	63082800 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1094357217 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Australian constitutional law Alien (law) Peter Dutton University of New South Wales Virginia Bell (judge) Department of Home Affairs (Australia) Indigenous Law Centre Constitution of Australia Chief Justice of Australia Migration Act 1958 Section 51 of the Constitution of Australia Christian Porter Geoffrey Nettle Indigenous Australian case law Anne Twomey (academic) Mabo v Queensland (No 2) Stephen Gageler Australian constitutional law Rights in the Australian Constitution cases 2020 in Australian law Law Council of Australia Aboriginal Australians 2020 in case law Federal Court of Australia Papua New Guinea Gunggari people High Court of Australia Attorney-General of Australia James Edelman Attorney-General of Victoria High Court of Australia cases Australian migration law Susan Kiefel Domestic violence Assault occasioning actual bodily harm Australian Aboriginal identity Australian permanent resident Australian nationality law Michelle Gordon New Zealand Wamba Wamba Justices Patrick Keane (justice) Native title Aboriginal sovereignty Kamilaroi people
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-12/high-court-love-and-thoms-aboriginal-connection-to-land/11954662 http://eresources.hcourt.gov.au/showCase/2020/HCA/3 http://www.cefa.org.au/ccf/high-court-decision-defines-aboriginal-australian-identity https://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/case_b43-2018
sameAs	Love v Commonwealth Love v Commonwealth
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Cite_web dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_Australian_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_AustLII dbt:Infobox_court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300
ArgueDate	0001-05-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
court	High Court of Australia
judges	Virginia Bell (judge) Chief Justice of Australia Geoffrey Nettle Stephen Gageler James Edelman Susan Kiefel Michelle Gordon Justices Patrick Keane (justice)
has abstract	Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth is a High Court of Australia case that held that Aboriginal Australians could not be classified as aliens under section 51(xix) of the Australian Constitution. The case was decided on 11 February 2020. (en)
date decided	2020-02-11 (xsd:date)
number of judges	7 (xsd:integer)
opinions	Aboriginal Australians are not within the reach of the "aliens" power conferred by s 51 of the Constitution. Mr Thoms is an Aboriginal Australian and is not an alien under section 51 of the Australian Constitution. (en) Aboriginal Australians are not within the reach of the "aliens" power conferred by s 51 of the Constitution). The Court is unable, however, to agree as to whether Mr Love is an Aboriginal Australian and unable to determine whether Mr Love is an "alien" under section 51 of the Australian Constitution. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Love_v_Commonwealth?oldid=1094357217&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	10739 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Love_v_Commonwealth
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Alien (law) Thoms v Commonwealth Thoms v Commonwealth of Australia Love v Commonwealth of Australia Love v Commonwealth of Australia; Thoms v Commonwealth of Australia Stan Grant (journalist) Samuel Griffith Society

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 52 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software