About: Luton v Lessels

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Luton v Lessels Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/2LnQqzEMf7

Luton v Lessels (2002) 165 CLR 462 is a High Court of Australia case that affirms previous High Court definitions of a tax.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	place yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	Luton v Lessels (en)
rdfs:comment	Luton v Lessels (2002) 165 CLR 462 is a High Court of Australia case that affirms previous High Court definitions of a tax. (en)
name	Luton v Lessels (en)
foaf:depiction
dct:subject	Australian constitutional law Taxation in the Australian Constitution cases High Court of Australia cases 2002 in case law 2002 in Australian law
Wikipage page ID	5663163 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1100110468 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Australian constitutional law Constitution of Australia George Winterton Murray Gleeson Constitutional basis of taxation in Australia Commonwealth Law Reports Australian constitutional law Taxation in the Australian Constitution cases High Court of Australia Michael McHugh (judge) High Court of Australia cases 2002 in case law Kenneth Hayne Mary Gaudron 2002 in Australian law Ian Callinan Michael Kirby (judge)
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2002/13.html
sameAs	Luton v Lessels Luton v Lessels Luton v Lessels
subsequent actions	none (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_Australian_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Infobox_court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300
citations	http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2002/13.html
court	High Court of Australia
full name	Luton v Lessels & Anor (en)
judges	Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Kirby, Hayne and Callinan JJ (en)
has abstract	Luton v Lessels (2002) 165 CLR 462 is a High Court of Australia case that affirms previous High Court definitions of a tax. (en)
date decided	2002-04-11 (xsd:date)
opinions	' The scheme established by the Child Support Act 1988 and the Child Support Act 1989 for the collection and payment of money otherwise payable to or receivable by the recipient is not a tax ' The Acts do not confer on the Child Support Agency judicial power and are not offensive to the doctrine of separation of powers (en)
prior actions	none (en)
gold:hypernym	Court
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Luton_v_Lessels?oldid=1100110468&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	3024 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Luton_v_Lessels
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of High Court of Australia cases Luton (disambiguation)
is Wikipage disambiguates of	Luton (disambiguation)
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Luton_v_Lessels

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 52 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software