About: Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FMaharanee_of_Baroda_v_Wildenstein&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

HRH the Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein, was a decision of the English Court of Appeal relating to the conflict of laws, and specifically whether the English courts should take jurisdiction in relation to a claim which had no substantial connections with England on the basis that the defendant was served with proceedings during a brief visit to the country. However the principle established by the case that presence within the jurisdiction is not negated only because it is a short or transient presence remains good law.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein (en)
rdfs:comment	HRH the Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein, was a decision of the English Court of Appeal relating to the conflict of laws, and specifically whether the English courts should take jurisdiction in relation to a claim which had no substantial connections with England on the basis that the defendant was served with proceedings during a brief visit to the country. However the principle established by the case that presence within the jurisdiction is not negated only because it is a short or transient presence remains good law. (en)
name	Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	English conflict of laws case law 1972 in British law 1972 in case law
Wikipage page ID	52847984 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1062406674 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	All England Law Reports John Stephenson (judge) Surveyor of the Queen's Works of Art Christie's François Boucher Conflict of laws Sita Devi (Maharani of Baroda) Francis Watson (art historian) Stay of proceedings English conflict of laws case law Court of Appeal of England and Wales Jurisdiction Daniel Wildenstein Edmund Davies, Baron Edmund-Davies Forum shopping 1972 in British law 1972 in case law Forum non conveniens Judicial functions of the House of Lords Legal burden of proof Ascot Racecourse Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd Alfred Denning, Baron Denning Brussels Regime Rudeness Queens Bench Law Reports Weekly Law Reports
sameAs	Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Cquote dbt:R dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Use_Oxford_spelling dbt:Infobox_court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Boucher_par_Gustav_Lundberg_1741.jpg?width=300
caption	The French master, François Boucher (en)
citations	[1972] 2 All ER 689 (en) [1972] 2 QB 283 (en) [1972] 2 WLR 1077 (en)
court	Court of Appeal of England and Wales
full name	H.R.H. Maharanee Sethadevi Gaekwar of Baroda v Daniel Wildenstein (en)
judges	John Stephenson (judge) Edmund Davies, Baron Edmund-Davies Alfred Denning, Baron Denning
keywords	forum non conveniens (en)
has abstract	HRH the Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein, was a decision of the English Court of Appeal relating to the conflict of laws, and specifically whether the English courts should take jurisdiction in relation to a claim which had no substantial connections with England on the basis that the defendant was served with proceedings during a brief visit to the country. The case was decided before the modern development of the doctrine of forum non conveniens and the decision of the House of Lords in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd, and is no longer considered to be good law in that regard. The case is often still referred to by way of illustration to the parochial and slightly paternalistic view previously taken by the English courts in relation to matters of jurisdiction, and in particular the comments of Lord Denning MR and Edmund Davies LJ. However the principle established by the case that presence within the jurisdiction is not negated only because it is a short or transient presence remains good law. (en)
date decided	1972-03-09 (xsd:date)
number of judges	3 (xsd:integer)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Maharanee_of_Baroda_v_Wildenstein?oldid=1062406674&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	9289 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Maharanee_of_Baroda_v_Wildenstein
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Sita Devi, Maharani of Baroda
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Maharanee_of_Baroda_v_Wildenstein

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software