About: Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FMicrosoft_Corp._v._Motorola_Inc.&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc., 696 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2012) was a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case about Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (RAND) Licensing and foreign anti-suit injunction.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc. (en)
rdfs:comment	Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc., 696 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2012) was a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case about Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (RAND) Licensing and foreign anti-suit injunction. (en)
foaf:homepage	http://www.microsoft.com
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	Conflict of laws case law United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases United States contract case law United States patent case law
Wikipage page ID	40742295 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1090965069 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Conflict of laws case law Beneficiary Royalties F. Supp. 2d Patent ambush Anti-suit injunction United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Interlocutory Patent infringement Motorola Conflict of laws Appellate court Sidney R. Thomas Standards organization Bad faith United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases United States contract case law European Patent Convention Forum shopping Reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing International Telecommunication Union United States patent case law Abuse of discretion J. Clifford Wallace Hold-up problem Smartphone wars Marsha Berzon H.264/MPEG-4 AVC IEEE 802.11 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Microsoft Xbox 360 Preliminary injunction W.D. Wash. F.3d U.S.P.Q.2d
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20120928162 https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20120515d16 http://www.microsoft.com http://www.motorola.com
sameAs	Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc. Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc. Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Infobox_COA_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_American_English dbt:Use_mdy_dates
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_States_Courts,_Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg?width=300
Prior	172800.0 (second)
ArgueDate	0001-09-11 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2012 (xsd:integer)
citations	17280.0 (second)
court	United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
CourtSeal	Seal of the United States Courts, Ninth Judicial Circuit.svg (en)
DecideDate	0001-09-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2012 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc., and Gen. Instrument Corp. (en)
Holding	Temporary anti-suit injunction upheld on interlocutory appeal (en)
judges	Sidney R. Thomas J. Clifford Wallace Marsha Berzon
Litigants	Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc. (en)
majority	Berzon (en)
has abstract	Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc., 696 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2012) was a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case about Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (RAND) Licensing and foreign anti-suit injunction. The case was originally filed by Microsoft against Motorola in the Western District Court of Washington on November 9, 2010, claiming that Motorola had violated its reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing agreement to which Microsoft was a third-party beneficiary. The district court ruled that a company's agreement with a standards organization to provide Reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) terms of licensing to all other parties constitutes a contract that is enforceable by third parties. While the U.S. domestic contract litigation had been proceeding, Motorola sued Microsoft in Germany for patent infringement in July 2011. The German district court granted Motorola an injunction prohibiting Microsoft from selling allegedly infringing products in Germany based on German patent law. Then, Microsoft sought an anti-suit injunction against an injunction of patent infringement in Germany. The district court granted Microsoft an anti-suit injunction that prevented Motorola from enforcing a foreign patent infringement injunction that Motorola had obtained against Microsoft in Germany. After granting to Microsoft this preliminary injunction, the case was brought to the Appellate court in an interlocutory appeal by Motorola. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's foreign anti-suit injunction for abuse of discretion, and affirmed the District Court's decision. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Microsoft_Corp._v._Motorola_Inc.?oldid=1090965069&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	17799 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Microsoft_Corp._v._Motorola_Inc.
is rdfs:seeAlso of	Advanced Video Coding
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Conflict of laws Reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing Microsoft v. Motorola
is Wikipage redirect of	Microsoft v. Motorola
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Microsoft_Corp._v._Motorola_Inc.

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software