In Canada, the term non-status Indian refers to any First Nations person who for whatever reason is not registered with the federal government, or is not registered to a band which signed a treaty with the Crown. For several decades, status Indian women automatically became non-status if they married men who were not status Indians. Prior to 1955, a status Indian could lose their status and become non-status through enfranchisement (voluntarily giving up status, usually for a minimal cash payment), by obtaining a college degree or becoming an ordained minister.
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Indiani senza status (it)
- Non-status Indian (en)
|
| rdfs:comment
| - In Canada, the term non-status Indian refers to any First Nations person who for whatever reason is not registered with the federal government, or is not registered to a band which signed a treaty with the Crown. For several decades, status Indian women automatically became non-status if they married men who were not status Indians. Prior to 1955, a status Indian could lose their status and become non-status through enfranchisement (voluntarily giving up status, usually for a minimal cash payment), by obtaining a college degree or becoming an ordained minister. (en)
- In Canada, l'espressione indiano senza status è un termine giuridico che designa qualsiasi individuo delle Prime Nazioni che, per qualsiasi ragione, non sia registrato presso il governo federale o presso una banda che ha firmato un trattato con la Corona. Per vari decenni le donne indiane munite di status divenivano automaticamente prive di status se sposavano uomini che erano indiani senza status. (it)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Wikipage page ID
| |
| Wikipage revision ID
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
| sameAs
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| has abstract
| - In Canada, the term non-status Indian refers to any First Nations person who for whatever reason is not registered with the federal government, or is not registered to a band which signed a treaty with the Crown. For several decades, status Indian women automatically became non-status if they married men who were not status Indians. Prior to 1955, a status Indian could lose their status and become non-status through enfranchisement (voluntarily giving up status, usually for a minimal cash payment), by obtaining a college degree or becoming an ordained minister. The 2013 Federal Court case Daniels v. Canada established that non-status Indians (and Métis) have the same aboriginal rights as status Indians, in that they are encompassed in the 1867 Constitution Act's language about "Indians". However, the 2014 Federal Court of Appeal decision "Daniels v Canada" overturned that verdict after the government appealed. In 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the 2013 verdict after a subsequent appeal on the 2014 decision. As a result, the federal government has jurisdiction and fiduciary duty over status Indians, non-status Indians, and Métis alike. (en)
- In Canada, l'espressione indiano senza status è un termine giuridico che designa qualsiasi individuo delle Prime Nazioni che, per qualsiasi ragione, non sia registrato presso il governo federale o presso una banda che ha firmato un trattato con la Corona. Per vari decenni le donne indiane munite di status divenivano automaticamente prive di status se sposavano uomini che erano indiani senza status. Anteriormente al 1955, un indiano con status poteva perdere tale condizione e diventare senza status attraverso l'affrancamento (rinunciando volontariamente allo status, di solito a fronte del pagamento di una piccola somma di denaro), ottenendo una laurea universitaria o venendo ordinato ministro di un culto. Il caso del 2013 Daniels v. Canada dinanzi alla Corte federale ha stabilito che gli Indiani senza status (e i Métis) hanno gli stessi diritti aborigeni delle persone con status, in quanto sono ricompresi nella definizione di "Indiani" adottata dalla Legge costituzionale del 1867. Tuttavia, la decisione del 2014 della su Daniels v. Canada ha rovesciato quel verdetto dopo che il governo aveva proposto appello. Nel 2016, la Corte suprema del Canada ha confermato il verdetto del 2013 dopo un appello successivo contro la decisione del 2014. Di conseguenza, il governo federale ha giurisdizione e obblighi fiduciari allo stesso modo verso gli Indiani con status, gli Indiani senza status e i Métis. (it)
|
| gold:hypernym
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
| is Wikipage redirect
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)