About: Olmstead v. L.C.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Olmstead v. L.C. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FOlmstead_v._L.C.&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding discrimination against people with mental disabilities. The Supreme Court held that under the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals with mental disabilities have the right to live in the community rather than in institutions if, in the words of the opinion of the Court, "the State's treatment professionals have determined that community placement is appropriate, the transfer from institutional care to a less restrictive setting is not opposed by the affected individual, and the placement can be reasonably accommodated, taking into account the resources available to the State and the needs of others with mental disabilities." The case was brought by the Atlanta Legal Aid Society on behalf of Lois C

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Olmstead v. L.C. (en)
rdfs:comment	Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding discrimination against people with mental disabilities. The Supreme Court held that under the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals with mental disabilities have the right to live in the community rather than in institutions if, in the words of the opinion of the Court, "the State's treatment professionals have determined that community placement is appropriate, the transfer from institutional care to a less restrictive setting is not opposed by the affected individual, and the placement can be reasonably accommodated, taking into account the resources available to the State and the needs of others with mental disabilities." The case was brought by the Atlanta Legal Aid Society on behalf of Lois C (en)
foaf:name	(en) Tommy Olmstead, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Human Resources, et al., Petitioners v. L. C., by Jonathan Zimring, guardian ad litem and next friend, et al. (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	United States Supreme Court cases Deinstitutionalization in the United States Mental health law in the United States United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court 1999 in United States case law Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 United States disability case law
Wikipage page ID	17253633 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1121342005 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Schizophrenia List of United States Supreme Court cases List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 527 Personality disorder United States Supreme Court United States Supreme Court cases Georgia (U.S. state) Bloomberg BNA Lois Curtis Deinstitutionalization in the United States Mental health law in the United States Jarvis hearings Americans with Disabilities Act Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court Guardian ad litem ADA Litigation in the United States 1999 in United States case law Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 United States disability case law L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States Disability Intellectual disability Next friend Mental illness Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.olmsteadrights.org/ https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/527/581.html https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/527/581/ https://web.archive.org/web/20101020010102/http:/bazelon.org/Where-We-Stand/Community-Integration/Olmstead-.aspx https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/98-536.ZS.html http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep527/usrep527581/usrep527581.pdf http://www.ada.gov/olmstead/documents/georgia_settle.pdf https://www.oyez.org/cases/1998/98-536
sameAs	Olmstead v. L.C. Olmstead v. L.C. Olmstead v. L.C. Olmstead v. L.C.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/P062011PS-0478-Lois-Curtis-Barack-Obama-Oval-Office-20-Jun-2011.jpg?width=300
Dissent	Thomas (en)
JoinDissent	Rehnquist, Scalia (en)
JoinMajority	O'Connor, Souter, Breyer ; Stevens (en)
LawsApplied	Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
OralArgument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1998/98-536
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1998/98-536
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
USPage	581 (xsd:integer)
USVol	527 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-04-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1999 (xsd:integer)
case	Olmstead v. L.C., (en)
DecideDate	0001-06-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1999 (xsd:integer)
findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/527/581.html
fullname	Tommy Olmstead, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Human Resources, et al., Petitioners v. L. C., by Jonathan Zimring, guardian ad litem and next friend, et al. (en)
Holding	Under Title II of the ADA, States are required to place persons with mental disabilities in community settings rather than in institutions when the State's treatment professionals have determined that: community placement is appropriate, the transfer from institutional care to a less restrictive setting is not opposed by the affected individual, and the placement can be reasonably accommodated, taking into account the resources available to the State and the needs of others with mental disabilities. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/527/581/
Litigants	Olmstead v. L.C. (en)
majority	Ginsburg (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep527/usrep527581/usrep527581.pdf
has abstract	Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding discrimination against people with mental disabilities. The Supreme Court held that under the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals with mental disabilities have the right to live in the community rather than in institutions if, in the words of the opinion of the Court, "the State's treatment professionals have determined that community placement is appropriate, the transfer from institutional care to a less restrictive setting is not opposed by the affected individual, and the placement can be reasonably accommodated, taking into account the resources available to the State and the needs of others with mental disabilities." The case was brought by the Atlanta Legal Aid Society on behalf of Lois Curtis. (en)
Concurrence	Stevens (en) Kennedy (en)
cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/98-536.ZS.html
JoinConcurrence	Breyer (en)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 63 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software