"Ought implies can" is an ethical formula ascribed to Immanuel Kant that claims an agent, if morally obliged to perform a certain action, must logically be able to perform it: For if the moral law commands that we ought to be better human beings now, it inescapably follows that we must be capable of being better human beings. The action to which the "ought" applies must indeed be possible under natural conditions. "Ought implies can" is logically equivalent to the formula , which means "impossible implies omissible".
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:label
| - Seharusnya menyiratkan dapat (in)
- Devoir implique pouvoir (fr)
- Ought implies can (en)
- Dever implica poder (pt)
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Devoir implique pouvoir est une formule éthique attribuée à Emmanuel Kant qui prétend qu'un agent, s'il est moralement obligé d'effectuer une certaine action, doit logiquement être en mesure de l'effectuer : « Car si la loi morale commande que nous « devons » être de meilleurs êtres humains maintenant, il en résulte inévitablement que nous devons être « capables » d'être de meilleurs êtres humains. » « L'action à laquelle le « devrait » s'applique doit en effet être possible dans les conditions naturelles. » (fr)
- "Ought implies can" is an ethical formula ascribed to Immanuel Kant that claims an agent, if morally obliged to perform a certain action, must logically be able to perform it: For if the moral law commands that we ought to be better human beings now, it inescapably follows that we must be capable of being better human beings. The action to which the "ought" applies must indeed be possible under natural conditions. "Ought implies can" is logically equivalent to the formula , which means "impossible implies omissible". (en)
- "Seharusnya menyiratkan dapat" adalah asas etika yang dicetuskan oleh Immanuel Kant yang menyatakan bahwa jika seseorang diharuskan secara moral untuk melakukan tindakan tertentu, maka secara logis ia harus dapat melakukannya: Apabila hukum moral memerintahkan agar kita seharusnya menjadi manusia yang lebih baik, maka kesimpulan yang tak terhindarkan adalah bahwa kita harus dapat menjadi manusia yang lebih baik. Tindakan yang "seharusnya" harus mungkin [dilakukan] dalam keadaan alamiah. (in)
- Dever implica poder é um princípio ético atribuído a Immanuel Kant que afirma que se um agente é moralmente obrigado a fazer determinada ação, essa ação deve ser possível. Segundo o filósofo, "Pois se a lei moral ordena que devemos agora ser homens melhores, segue-se de modo ineludível que devemos também poder sê-lo". Além disso, "[...] ação deverá sempre ser possível sob as condições naturais, quando o dever se lhe aplica; [...]". (pt)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Wikipage page ID
| |
| Wikipage revision ID
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
| sameAs
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| has abstract
| - Devoir implique pouvoir est une formule éthique attribuée à Emmanuel Kant qui prétend qu'un agent, s'il est moralement obligé d'effectuer une certaine action, doit logiquement être en mesure de l'effectuer : « Car si la loi morale commande que nous « devons » être de meilleurs êtres humains maintenant, il en résulte inévitablement que nous devons être « capables » d'être de meilleurs êtres humains. » « L'action à laquelle le « devrait » s'applique doit en effet être possible dans les conditions naturelles. » Kant pense que ce principe est une liberté catégorique, seulement limitée par le libre arbitre contrairement à la liberté hypothétique de David Hume (« Libre de faire autrement si je l'avais ainsi choisi »). Il y a plusieurs façons de dériver la formule par exemple l'argument selon lequel il est erroné de blâmer les gens pour des choses qu'ils ne peuvent pas contrôler (ainsi formulée, l'essence de l'argument est que le contrepoint « ne peut pas » implique « n'a aucune obligation à »). (fr)
- "Ought implies can" is an ethical formula ascribed to Immanuel Kant that claims an agent, if morally obliged to perform a certain action, must logically be able to perform it: For if the moral law commands that we ought to be better human beings now, it inescapably follows that we must be capable of being better human beings. The action to which the "ought" applies must indeed be possible under natural conditions. Kant believed this principle was a categorical freedom, bound only by the free will as opposed to the Humean hypothetical freedom ("Free to do otherwise if I had so chosen"). There are several ways of deriving the formula—for example, the argument that it is wrong to blame people for things that they cannot control (essentially phrasing the formula as the contrapositive "'cannot' implies 'has no duty to'"). This ethical formula can be expressed in deontic logic with the multimodal axiom: , where the deontic operator means "It's obligatory that..." and the alethic operator means "It's possible that...". However, in practical situations, obligations are usually assigned in anticipation of future events, in which case alethic possibilities can be hard to judge; Therefore, obligation assignments may be performed under the assumption of different conditions on different branches of timelines in the future, and past obligation assignments may be updated due to unforeseen developments that happened along the timeline. "Ought implies can" is logically equivalent to the formula , which means "impossible implies omissible". (en)
- "Seharusnya menyiratkan dapat" adalah asas etika yang dicetuskan oleh Immanuel Kant yang menyatakan bahwa jika seseorang diharuskan secara moral untuk melakukan tindakan tertentu, maka secara logis ia harus dapat melakukannya: Apabila hukum moral memerintahkan agar kita seharusnya menjadi manusia yang lebih baik, maka kesimpulan yang tak terhindarkan adalah bahwa kita harus dapat menjadi manusia yang lebih baik. Tindakan yang "seharusnya" harus mungkin [dilakukan] dalam keadaan alamiah. Dalam kata lain, jika suatu tindakan tidak dapat dilakukan seseorang, menurut asas ini orang tersebut tidak dapat memiliki kewajiban moral untuk melakukan hal tersebut. Kant percaya bahwa asas ini merupakan yang hanya terikat oleh kehendak bebas, dan hal ini berlawanan dengan kebebasan hipotetis e David Hume ("bebas untuk melakukan yang lain apabila saya telah memutuskannya"). Contoh praktis dari asas ini adalah argumen bahwa kita tidak dapat menyalahkan orang atas kejadian yang tidak dapat mereka kendalikan. (in)
- Dever implica poder é um princípio ético atribuído a Immanuel Kant que afirma que se um agente é moralmente obrigado a fazer determinada ação, essa ação deve ser possível. Segundo o filósofo, "Pois se a lei moral ordena que devemos agora ser homens melhores, segue-se de modo ineludível que devemos também poder sê-lo". Além disso, "[...] ação deverá sempre ser possível sob as condições naturais, quando o dever se lhe aplica; [...]". Kant acreditava que esse princípio era uma liberdade categórica cujo limite era livre-arbítrio, em oposição à liberdade hipotética de David Hume. Existem várias maneiras de postular esse o princípio como, por exemplo, o argumento de que é errado culpar pessoas por coisas que elas não podem controlar. Nesse sentido, se postulamos o princípio de que dever implica poder numa lógica deôntica alética proposicional como , podemos tomar a contrapositiva dessa implicação, que será . Lê-se a primeira fórmula como "Se é obrigatório fazer p, então é possível fazer p". A segunda, por outro lado, é lida como "Se é impossível fazer p, então não é obrigatório fazer p". (pt)
|
| gold:hypernym
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)