About: PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FPUD_No._1_of_Jefferson_County_v._Washington_Department_of_Ecology&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology, 511 U.S. 700 (1994), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that interpreted section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The case involved an application by the and Tacoma City Light in northwestern Washington to build a hydropower facility on the Dosewallips River, first proposed in 1982 and known as the "Elkhorn Dam" project. The Washington State Department of Ecology issued a certification to the project in 1986 that imposed minimum water flow requirements to protect species of salmon and steelhead under the federal Clean Water Act. Tacoma City Light argued that the dam project would only need to adhere to minimum flow standards set by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), who license dams. Environmenta

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology (en)
rdfs:comment	PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology, 511 U.S. 700 (1994), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that interpreted section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The case involved an application by the and Tacoma City Light in northwestern Washington to build a hydropower facility on the Dosewallips River, first proposed in 1982 and known as the "Elkhorn Dam" project. The Washington State Department of Ecology issued a certification to the project in 1986 that imposed minimum water flow requirements to protect species of salmon and steelhead under the federal Clean Water Act. Tacoma City Light argued that the dam project would only need to adhere to minimum flow standards set by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), who license dams. Environmenta (en)
foaf:name	(en) PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology (en)
dcterms:subject	United States environmental case law Water law in the United States 1994 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases Environmental issues in Washington (state) Water case law 1994 in the environment Fisheries law United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court Tacoma Public Utilities History of Jefferson County, Washington
Wikipage page ID	44532849 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	994414875 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	United States environmental case law Water law in the United States dbr:Thurston_County_Superior_Court dbr:Washington_Pollution_Control_Hearings_Board 1994 in United States case law Hydroelectric United States Supreme Court cases Salmon Environmental issues in Washington (state) Water case law 1994 in the environment Fisheries law Clean Water Act The New York Times Federal Power Act Washington (state) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court Hydropower Tacoma Public Utilities L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States Hood Canal Trout Dosewallips River Olympic Mountains Olympic National Forest Olympic National Park History of Jefferson County, Washington Washington Supreme Court Washington State Department of Ecology dbr:Invisible_College_Press Steelhead Washington State Supreme Court Tacoma City Light dbr:Jefferson_County_Public_Utility_District
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.invispress.com/law/environmental/pud.html https://www.oyez.org/cases/1993/92-1911 http://www.lawschoolcasebriefs.net/2013/05/pud-no-1-of-jefferson-county-v.html https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/511/700/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-1911.ZS.html https://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/01/us/supreme-court-roundup-justices-give-states-control-of-water-quantity-too.html http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep511/usrep511700/usrep511700.pdf
sameAs	PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_news dbt:Convert dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:SCOTUS-stub
Dissent	Thomas (en)
docket	92 (xsd:integer)
JoinDissent	Scalia (en)
JoinMajority	Rehnquist, Blackmun, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg (en)
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1993/92-1911
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
USPage	700 (xsd:integer)
USVol	511 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-02-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1994 (xsd:integer)
case	PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology, (en)
DecideDate	0001-05-31 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1994 (xsd:integer)
fullname	PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology (en)
Holding	172800.0 (second)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/511/700/
Litigants	PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology (en)
majority	O'Connor (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep511/usrep511700/usrep511700.pdf
has abstract	PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology, 511 U.S. 700 (1994), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that interpreted section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The case involved an application by the and Tacoma City Light in northwestern Washington to build a hydropower facility on the Dosewallips River, first proposed in 1982 and known as the "Elkhorn Dam" project. The Washington State Department of Ecology issued a certification to the project in 1986 that imposed minimum water flow requirements to protect species of salmon and steelhead under the federal Clean Water Act. Tacoma City Light argued that the dam project would only need to adhere to minimum flow standards set by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), who license dams. Environmentalist groups argued that the FERC was insensitive to recreation and protection of salmon and steelhead and asked the state to enforce its minimum flow standards. The Washington State Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state Department of Ecology on April 1, 1993. The case was taken to the United States Supreme Court the following year, where the court ruled 7–2 in favor of the state. (en)
Concurrence	Stevens (en)
cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-1911.ZS.html
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:PUD_No._1_of_Jefferson_County_v._Washington_Department_of_Ecology?oldid=994414875&ns=0

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software