About: Pape v Commissioner of Taxation

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Pape v Commissioner of Taxation Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/8MgBERyWX4

Pape v Commissioner of Taxation is an Australian court case concerning the constitutional validity of the Tax Bonus for Working Australians Act (No 2) 2009 (Cth) which seeks to give one-off payments of up to $900 to Australian taxpayers. The decision of the High Court of Australia was announced on 3 April 2009, with reasons to follow later. The Court concluded, by a 4–3 majority, that the Act was a valid law of the Commonwealth supported by a head of legislative power under the Constitution.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Pape v Commissioner of Taxation (en)
rdfs:comment	Pape v Commissioner of Taxation is an Australian court case concerning the constitutional validity of the Tax Bonus for Working Australians Act (No 2) 2009 (Cth) which seeks to give one-off payments of up to $900 to Australian taxpayers. The decision of the High Court of Australia was announced on 3 April 2009, with reasons to follow later. The Court concluded, by a 4–3 majority, that the Act was a valid law of the Commonwealth supported by a head of legislative power under the Constitution. (en)
name	Pape v Commissioner of Taxation (en)
foaf:depiction
dct:subject	Australian constitutional law Taxation in the Australian Constitution cases 2009 in Australian law 2009 in case law High Court of Australia cases
Wikipage page ID	22233445 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1100119941 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Australian constitutional law Robert French University of New England (Australia) Virginia Bell (judge) Constitution of Australia Chief Justice of Australia George Williams (lawyer) Commonwealth Law Reports Australian Taxation Office Australian constitutional law Taxation in the Australian Constitution cases William Gummow Williams v Commonwealth 2009 in Australian law 2009 in case law Dyson Heydon Parliament of Australia List of High Court of Australia cases High Court of Australia High Court of Australia cases Kenneth Hayne Susan Crennan Susan Kiefel Bryan Pape National Party of Australia Financial crisis of 2007–2010 First Rudd Government
sameAs	Pape v Commissioner of Taxation Pape v Commissioner of Taxation Pape v Commissioner of Taxation
subsequent actions	none (en)
transcripts	1 (xsd:integer) 13 (xsd:integer) 30 (xsd:integer) 31 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:R dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_Australian_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_AustLII dbt:Infobox_Court_Case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300
court	High Court of Australia (en)
full name	Pape v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia & The Commonwealth of Australia (en)
judges	French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ (en)
has abstract	Pape v Commissioner of Taxation is an Australian court case concerning the constitutional validity of the Tax Bonus for Working Australians Act (No 2) 2009 (Cth) which seeks to give one-off payments of up to $900 to Australian taxpayers. The decision of the High Court of Australia was announced on 3 April 2009, with reasons to follow later. The plaintiff in the case, Bryan Pape, was a law lecturer and barrister who represented himself before the Court. He challenged the legislation on the ground that the payments, said to be a tax bonus, were actually a gift and were not supported by the taxation power in the Constitution. The Commonwealth argued that the legislation was supported by all or any combination of the appropriations "power" under s 81 of the Constitution, the taxation power (s 51(ii)), the external affairs power (s 51(xxix)), the trade or commerce power (s 51(i)) and the implied nationhood power. The Court concluded, by a 4–3 majority, that the Act was a valid law of the Commonwealth supported by a head of legislative power under the Constitution. (en)
date decided	0001-04-03 (xsd:gMonthDay) 0001-07-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
opinions	* the plaintiff has standing * the "Bonus Act" is a valid law of the Commonwealth * there is a valid appropriation within the meaning of the Constitution * per agreement of the parties, no order for costs (en)
prior actions	none (en)
gold:hypernym	Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation?oldid=1100119941&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	13601 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	High Court of Australia Bryan Pape Pape v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia
is Wikipage redirect of	Pape v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 52 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software