About: Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatEnglishUnjustEnrichmentCases, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FPavey_%26_Matthews_Pty_Ltd_v_Paul&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul, is a leading Australian case concerning unjust enrichment, and an award for restitution based on quantum meruit.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case yago:WikicatEnglishUnjustEnrichmentCases
rdfs:label	Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (en)
rdfs:comment	Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul, is a leading Australian case concerning unjust enrichment, and an award for restitution based on quantum meruit. (en)
name	Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	1987 in case law 1987 in Australian law High Court of Australia cases Unjust enrichment
Wikipage page ID	37185416 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1100120031 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Ronald Wilson English unjust enrichment law 1987 in case law 1987 in Australian law Quantum meruit Gerard Brennan Oral contract Anthony Mason (judge) Commonwealth Law Reports Market rate Unenforceable William Deane Daryl Dawson Unjust enrichment High Court of Australia Cottage High Court of Australia cases Case law Unjust enrichment NSW Law Reports Restitution Justices The High Court of Australia NSW Court of Appeal
sameAs	Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Cquote dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_Australian_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_AustLII dbt:Infobox_court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300
court	High Court of Australia
keywords	Restitution, work, building, oral contract (en)
majority	Ronald Wilson Anthony Mason (judge) William Deane Daryl Dawson Justices
has abstract	Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul, is a leading Australian case concerning unjust enrichment, and an award for restitution based on quantum meruit. (en)
appealed from	NSW Court of Appeal
date decided	1987-03-04 (xsd:date)
dissenting	Gerard Brennan
prior actions	Paul v Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd 3 NSWLR 114 (en)
gold:hypernym	Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Pavey_&_Matthews_Pty_Ltd_v_Paul?oldid=1100120031&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	4518 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Pavey_&_Matthews_Pty_Ltd_v_Paul
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC List of High Court of Australia cases Unjust enrichment
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Pavey_&_Matthews_Pty_Ltd_v_Paul

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 58 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software