About: Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FPennsylvania_Coal_Co._v._Mahon&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that whether a regulatory act constitutes a taking requiring compensation depends on the extent of diminution in the value of the property.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that whether a regulatory act constitutes a taking requiring compensation depends on the extent of diminution in the value of the property. (en)
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
Dissent
  • Brandeis (en)
JoinMajority
  • Taft, McKenna, Day, Van Devanter, Pitney, McReynolds, Sutherland (en)
LawsApplied
ParallelCitations
Prior
  • Mahon v. Pa. Coal Co., 274 Pa. 489, 118 A. 491 (en)
USPage
USVol
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
  • Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, (en)
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
  • Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon (en)
Holding
  • Whether a regulatory act constitutes a taking requiring compensation depends on the extent of diminution in the value of the property. (en)
justia
Litigants
  • Pennsylvania Coal Company v. Mahon (en)
majority
  • Holmes (en)
loc
has abstract
  • Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that whether a regulatory act constitutes a taking requiring compensation depends on the extent of diminution in the value of the property. The decision thereby started the doctrine of regulatory taking. The Takings Clause originally applied only when the government physically seized or occupied property. Prior to 1922, American courts followed a clear rule: regulation of land was not a taking. Rather, it was simply an exercise of the government’s police power to protect the public health, safety, welfare, and morals. Pennsylvania Coal also established the diminution-of-value test, in contrast to other tests, such as the permanent physical occupations test of Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. (1982), the nuisance-control measures test of Hadacheck v. Sebastian (1915), and the total takings test of Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1992). Additionally, the case was one of the first to address the denominator problem with regard to regulatory taking. (en)
googlescholar
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software