About: R v Barger

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: R v Barger Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FR_v_Barger&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

R v Barger is a 1908 High Court of Australia case where the majority held that the taxation power could not be used by the Australian Parliament to indirectly regulate the working conditions of workers. In this case, an excise tariff was imposed on manufacturers, with an exemption being available for those who paid "fair and reasonable" wages to their employees.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	place yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	R v Barger (en)
rdfs:comment	R v Barger is a 1908 High Court of Australia case where the majority held that the taxation power could not be used by the Australian Parliament to indirectly regulate the working conditions of workers. In this case, an excise tariff was imposed on manufacturers, with an exemption being available for those who paid "fair and reasonable" wages to their employees. (en)
name	R v Barger (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	Australian constitutional law Taxation in the Australian Constitution cases Australian labour case law 1908 in Australian law 1908 in case law High Court of Australia cases
Wikipage page ID	5661018 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1100114377 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Protectionist Party Samuel Griffith Australian constitutional law Hugh Victor McKay Attorney-General for Australia Robert Garran 1910 Australian federal election Constitution of Australia Chief Justice of Australia Chief Justice of Queensland George Winterton Constitutional Convention (Australia) Constitutional basis of taxation in Australia Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration Federation of Australia Stripper (agriculture) Sunshine Harvester Works Australian Labor Party Australian constitutional law Taxation in the Australian Constitution cases Watson Ministry Alfred Deakin Edmund Barton Australian labour case law Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co. Ltd. Owen Dixon Parliament of Australia Parliament of Victoria H. B. Higgins Harvester case High Court of Australia 1908 in Australian law 1908 in case law Isaac Isaacs High Court of Australia cases Coins of the Australian pound Minimum wage Second Deakin Ministry Section 90 of the Constitution of Australia Excise Reserved powers doctrine Richard Edward O'Connor Justices Section 51(ii) of the Australian Constitution dbr:Wiktionary:aliunde dbr:Wiktionary:inhere dbr:Wiktionary:residuum
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.aph.gov.au/binaries/library/intguide/law/harvester.pdf http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1908/43.pdf
sameAs	R v Barger R v Barger R v Barger
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Main dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:TOC_limit dbt:Use_Australian_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_AustLII dbt:Infobox_court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300
court	High Court of Australia
full name	The King and the Minister of State for the Commonwealth Administering the Customs v Barger (en) The Commonwealth and A. W. Smart, Collector of Customs v McKay (en)
judges	Samuel Griffith Chief Justice of Australia Edmund Barton H. B. Higgins Isaac Isaacs Richard Edward O'Connor Justices
has abstract	R v Barger is a 1908 High Court of Australia case where the majority held that the taxation power could not be used by the Australian Parliament to indirectly regulate the working conditions of workers. In this case, an excise tariff was imposed on manufacturers, with an exemption being available for those who paid "fair and reasonable" wages to their employees. (en)
date decided	1908-06-26 (xsd:date)
number of judges	5 (xsd:integer)
opinions	even if it was a tax, the Act dealt with matters other than taxation; & (en) ( per Griffith CJ, Barton and O'Connor JJ) (en) it was not in substance a tax; (en) the Excise Tariff Act 1906 was invalid as: (en)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software