About: R v Brydges     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:Place, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FR_v_Brydges&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

R v Brydges, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 190 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the right to retain and instruct counsel under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court held that the right imposed a duty upon the police to provide information and access to a legal aid lawyer if needed. From this case came the term "Brydges Counsel" to refer to legal aid lawyers that assist recently arrested individuals.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • R v Brydges (en)
rdfs:comment
  • R v Brydges, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 190 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the right to retain and instruct counsel under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court held that the right imposed a duty upon the police to provide information and access to a legal aid lawyer if needed. From this case came the term "Brydges Counsel" to refer to legal aid lawyers that assist recently arrested individuals. (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
docket
JoinMajority
  • Wilson, Gonthier and Cory JJ. (en)
LawsApplied
  • R. v. Parks , 33 C.R.R. 1; Clarkson v. The Queen, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 383 (en)
citations
  • [1990] 1 S.C.R. 190 (en)
history
  • Judgment for the Crown in the Court of Appeal for Alberta. (en)
majority
  • Lamer J. (en)
ratio
  • When a detainee expresses concerns about his rights to counsel due to not being able to afford a lawyer, section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms requires the police to advise the detainee about the ability to speak to free duty counsel if a duty counsel program is available. (en)
has abstract
  • R v Brydges, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 190 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the right to retain and instruct counsel under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court held that the right imposed a duty upon the police to provide information and access to a legal aid lawyer if needed. From this case came the term "Brydges Counsel" to refer to legal aid lawyers that assist recently arrested individuals. (en)
case-name
  • R v Brydges (en)
Concurrence
  • La Forest J. (en)
decided-date
full-case-name
  • William Brydges v. Her Majesty The Queen (en)
heard-date
JoinConcurrence
  • L'Heureux-DubĂ© and McLachlin JJ. (en)
NotParticipating
  • Dickson C.J. and Sopinka J. (en)
ruling
  • Appeal allowed. (en)
SCC
gold:hypernym
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 52 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software