About: R v Clay

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: R v Clay Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FR_v_Clay&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

R v Clay [2003] 3 S.C.R. 735, 2003 SCC 75 is a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of the prohibition to possess marijuana. The accused claimed that his section 7 Charter rights were violated. The Court dismissed the claim. This case is the final of a trilogy of cases regarding the constitutionality of the prohibition of marijuana.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	R v Clay (en)
rdfs:comment	R v Clay [2003] 3 S.C.R. 735, 2003 SCC 75 is a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of the prohibition to possess marijuana. The accused claimed that his section 7 Charter rights were violated. The Court dismissed the claim. This case is the final of a trilogy of cases regarding the constitutionality of the prohibition of marijuana. (en)
dcterms:subject	Section Seven Charter case law 2003 in Canadian case law Supreme Court of Canada cases
Wikipage page ID	2772107 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	685894340 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Liberty London, Ontario Fundamental justice Section Seven Charter case law Section Seven of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 2003 in Canadian case law Supreme Court of Canada cases Supreme Court of Canada Security of person Marijuana R. v. Heywood Narcotics Control Act
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.norml.org/index.cfm%3FGroup_ID=4938
sameAs	R v Clay R v Clay R v Clay
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Cite_CanLII dbt:SCCInfoBox dbt:Lexum-scc
JoinMajority	McLachlin CJ. with Iacobucci, Major, and Bastarache JJ. (en)
citations	[2003] 3 S.C.R. 735, 2003 SCC 75 (en)
majority	Gonthier and Binnie JJ. (en)
has abstract	R v Clay [2003] 3 S.C.R. 735, 2003 SCC 75 is a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of the prohibition to possess marijuana. The accused claimed that his section 7 Charter rights were violated. The Court dismissed the claim. This case is the final of a trilogy of cases regarding the constitutionality of the prohibition of marijuana. (en)
case-name	R v Clay (en)
Concurrence/Dissent	LeBel J. (en) Arbour J. (en) Deschamp J. (en)
decided-date	2003-12-23 (xsd:date)
full-case-name	Christopher James Clay v. Her Majesty The Queen (en)
heard-date	2003-05-06 (xsd:date)
SCC	2002 (xsd:integer)
gold:hypernym	Decision
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:R_v_Clay?oldid=685894340&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	2942 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:R_v_Clay
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (McLachlin Court) 2003 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Arbour Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Binnie Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms R. v. Clay
is Wikipage redirect of	R. v. Clay
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:R_v_Clay

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 50 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software