About: R v Kang-Brown

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: R v Kang-Brown Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FR_v_Kang-Brown&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

R v Kang-Brown, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 456, 2008 SCC 18, is a constitutional decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the limits of police powers for search and seizure. The Court found that police do not have the right to perform a sniffer-dog search (to use dogs to conduct random searches) of public spaces when such search is not specifically authorized by statute. In this case, a suspect's section 8 rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter") were violated when a police officer stopped him at a bus station and sniffer-dog searched his bag finding drugs in his possession.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	R. c. Kang-Brown (fr) R v Kang-Brown (en)
rdfs:comment	R. c. Kang-Brown est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada rendu en 2008 concernant les limites des pouvoirs des agents de la paix en matière de fouilles, perquisitions et saisies. (fr) R v Kang-Brown, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 456, 2008 SCC 18, is a constitutional decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the limits of police powers for search and seizure. The Court found that police do not have the right to perform a sniffer-dog search (to use dogs to conduct random searches) of public spaces when such search is not specifically authorized by statute. In this case, a suspect's section 8 rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter") were violated when a police officer stopped him at a bus station and sniffer-dog searched his bag finding drugs in his possession. (en)
dcterms:subject	Section Eight Charter case law 2009 in Canadian case law Transport in Calgary Controlled substances case law Supreme Court of Canada cases Detection dogs
Wikipage page ID	25851942 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1028059944 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Detection dog Police Section Eight of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section Eight Charter case law Public space 2009 in Canadian case law Transport in Calgary Drug possession Alberta Court of Appeal List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (McLachlin Court) Controlled substances case law Supreme Court of Canada cases Supreme Court of Canada Suspect Detection dogs Greyhound Canada Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms R v AM Search and seizure Statute Section Twenty-four of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Detention of suspects
sameAs	R v Kang-Brown R v Kang-Brown R v Kang-Brown R v Kang-Brown
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Lexum-scc3 dbt:Essay-like dbt:Multiple_issues dbt:Unreferenced dbt:SCCInfoBox
Dissent	Bastarache J (en) Deschamps and Rothstein JJ (en)
JoinMajority	Fish, Abella and Charron JJ (en)
LawsApplied	R v AM, 2008 SCC 19 (en)
majority	LeBel J (en)
has abstract	R. c. Kang-Brown est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada rendu en 2008 concernant les limites des pouvoirs des agents de la paix en matière de fouilles, perquisitions et saisies. (fr) R v Kang-Brown, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 456, 2008 SCC 18, is a constitutional decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the limits of police powers for search and seizure. The Court found that police do not have the right to perform a sniffer-dog search (to use dogs to conduct random searches) of public spaces when such search is not specifically authorized by statute. In this case, a suspect's section 8 rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter") were violated when a police officer stopped him at a bus station and sniffer-dog searched his bag finding drugs in his possession. (en)
case-name	R v Kang-Brown (en)
Concurrence	Binnie J and McLachin CJ (en)
decided-date	2008-04-25 (xsd:date)
full-case-name	Her Majesty The Queen v Gurmakh Kang-Brown (en)
heard-date	2007-05-22 (xsd:date)
ruling	Appeal allowed by six judges, conviction voted to be set aside. (en)
SCC	2007 (xsd:integer)
gold:hypernym	Decision
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:R_v_Kang-Brown?oldid=1028059944&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	8175 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:R_v_Kang-Brown
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	2008 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (McLachlin Court) R v AM R. v. Kang-Brown
is Wikipage redirect of	R. v. Kang-Brown
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:R_v_Kang-Brown

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 52 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software