R v Pamajewon, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 821, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on Aboriginal self-government under section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Court held that the right to self-government, if it exists, is subject to reasonable limitations and excluded the right to control high-stakes gambling.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| |
rdfs:comment
| - R v Pamajewon, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 821, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on Aboriginal self-government under section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Court held that the right to self-government, if it exists, is subject to reasonable limitations and excluded the right to control high-stakes gambling. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
JoinMajority
| - La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ. (en)
|
LawsApplied
| - R v Van der Peet, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 507 (en)
|
citations
| |
majority
| |
has abstract
| - R v Pamajewon, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 821, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on Aboriginal self-government under section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Court held that the right to self-government, if it exists, is subject to reasonable limitations and excluded the right to control high-stakes gambling. (en)
|
case-name
| |
Concurrence
| |
decided-date
| |
full-case-name
| - Howard Pamajewon and Roger Jones v Her Majesty The Queen; Arnold Gardner, Jack Pitchenese and Allan Gardner v Her Majesty The Queen (en)
|
heard-date
| |
ruling
| - Pamajewon appeal dismissed. (en)
|
SCC
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |