Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG v Five Star General Trading LLC [2001] EWCA Civ 68, [2001] QB 825 (frequently shortened to RZB v Five Star) is a judicial decision of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales relating to the conflict of laws. The Court of Appeal held that the choice of law rules relating to contracts should be applied, and accordingly, the bank prevailed.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| - Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG v Five Star General Trading LLC (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG v Five Star General Trading LLC [2001] EWCA Civ 68, [2001] QB 825 (frequently shortened to RZB v Five Star) is a judicial decision of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales relating to the conflict of laws. The Court of Appeal held that the choice of law rules relating to contracts should be applied, and accordingly, the bank prevailed. (en)
|
name
| - Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG v Five Star General Trading LLC (en)
|
foaf:depiction
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
thumbnail
| |
caption
| - Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich headquarters (en)
|
citations
| - [2001] 1 All ER 961 (en)
- [2001] 1 LLR 597 (en)
- [2001] 1 Lloyd's Rep 597 (en)
- [2001] 2 WLR 1344 (en)
- [2001] 3 All ER 257 (en)
- [2001] CLC 843 (en)
- [2001] EWCA Civ 68 (en)
- [2001] Lloyd's Rep IR 460 (en)
- [2001] Lloyds Rep IR 460 (en)
- [2001] QB 825 (en)
|
court
| |
full name
| - Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG v Five Star General Trading LLC (en)
|
imagesize
| |
judges
| - Mance LJ, Aldous LJ and Charles J (en)
|
keywords
| - (en)
- conflict of laws (en)
- mortgage (en)
- characterisation (en)
|
has abstract
| - Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG v Five Star General Trading LLC [2001] EWCA Civ 68, [2001] QB 825 (frequently shortened to RZB v Five Star) is a judicial decision of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales relating to the conflict of laws. The case related to a security interest which was created in favour of the bank over the insurance proceeds relating to a ship. The sipo was later involved in a collision, and the third party sought to assert a claim to the insurance proceeds in priority to the bank's rights under the security agreement. The choice of law rules suggested different outcomes depending upon whether this was characterised as an issue of contract law (in which case it would be determined by English law, and the bank would prevail) or an issue of property law (in which case French law would apply, and the third party would prevail). The Court of Appeal held that the choice of law rules relating to contracts should be applied, and accordingly, the bank prevailed. (en)
|
appealed from
| |
Concur/dissent
| |
date decided
| |
decision by
| |
number of judges
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |